Search results

@Whitterquick My machine died of the infamous power plain issue common on this series a few months back, and I've since moved to 12th gen Core for AVX512 developement. what may be best moving forward would be to use gits patch application mechanism directly, or otherwise provide notes on how...

Apologies for the slow reply. Beyond the script itself, best way is to look at the actual lines being modified in the source driver instead of using the script, which may or may not continue to work on up stream I've pulled source for 5.15 and will be compiling in the next day or so. My...

the modifications had to do with other parts of the kernel, not with the patch itself- specifically they had to do with the binder kernel module. In other words, this patch is portable to other custom kernels.

modifications had to do with other stuff, more to say that the patch is still functional in upstream

I never mentioned it here, but I'm running the 5.11 main kernel branch with the patch and other modifications. still knee deep in other projects involving the kernel (working on GPGPU accels on NVIDIA jetson nanos and on porting the googles changes to QEMU to the main branch of QEMU)

few weeks- this is really low priority for me right now If you want to give it a shot and let me know, could be a good option

it may be possible to do so assuming you mean via something like DKMS. until then: Quite busy ATM, but if you want to test yourself: download source for kernel 5.8+. untar/zip etc. cd linux make clean make oldconfig scripts/config --enable CONFIG_HP_ILO=Y make prepare make -j35...

not a package, it's a kernel configuration option when building from source I've yet to test this, but came across it while compiling a custom kernel for a work thing in your kernel source folder run scripts/config --enable CONFIG_HP_ILO=Y to enable the ilo2+ interface. then run nano...

News on alternative method: turns out there's a built in kernel module that's rarely if ever enabled for hp ilo2+ support. This may mean we can remove the Rmrr for certain slots as proposed previously

did you try and dump the rom?

Pretty sure he meant to tag the other Alex that popped into this thread within the last week xD

Sorry, not sure I understand your question. If the question is can you compile a kernel from a VM, then yes absolutely. a Kernel is just a very advanced/complex program. If you wanted to you could compile the same Kernel IBM uses for PowerPC from a raspberry pi etc. if you're asking can you...

So that's pointing to a memory mapping error of some sort. Are you passing through the entire device? otherwise it looks like you're not alone in this per https://forum.level1techs.com/t/looking-for-vfio-wizards-to-troubleshoot-error-vfio-dma-map-22/153539 from the second line of qemu...

Mind sharing the error you received? I've been trying to get conrep working on g6/g7 which ate both officially supported, but haven't had success with it. if the errors aline it may point to conrep to correctly writing data or our input parameters not being parsed correctly

for G8 there's an official press for disabling this! check this link https://www.jimmdenton.com/proliant-intel-dpdk/

Read it as more of pulling the ZoL down, some of the files aren't where they're expected to be called from. almost looks like someone did a merge without double checking dependencies. More of an issue with Make than anything

do you mean the Navi Reset patch from Level1techs? If so, I didn't have any issues patching it and the RMRR patch from this thread; just make sure that both patches are separate. Also, you may have to LVM extend to make sure that it all fits- my compile peaked ~70GiB IIRC

Using it for now mainly for testing, mainly because it's a derivative from debian/buntu. Most of the included packages are things I'd be using anyway, and it's polished pretty damn well. Also, because the patch will be portable to pretty much anything based on debian buster without needing to...

I've since switched to using Pop!_OS for all of my VM needs, and since its based on Ubuntu, which itself is based on Debian, you can just directly load the kernel module in and not have to worry about it. for VM management I just use a VNC client that attaches to a virtual display with the...

Not sure how to take that Tried different things, including conrep, but just doesn't seem possible, without being so drastic as to mod the bios. for now I'm just out of ideas on this. As for the proxmox Staff, it's very intentional (and I'd do the same thing if I was a dev on this project)...