Search results

same problem here what should i do?

same here very weird

any news? having same issue for several months now, restarts have not helped, browsers other than chrome are working fine

I would look at logs for clues, but your issue sounds like it is related to being full, rather than just random like the other posts in this thread

Wait a second, I just noticed that Hetzner Storage Box is an internet backup service. I would say that the issue the OP is experiencing is related the WAN latency, unless it can be ruled out. or ISP traffic filtering.

From performing backup/restore on about 20 VMs/containers it seems that when the storage target is overwhelmed it stops responding to proxmox, even though it still responds to other network clients. Damn Ceph is complicated... ;)

could these be of interest? https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/cifs-issue-error-with-cfs-lock-file-storage_cfg-working-now-but-shows-question-mark.45962/ https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/issue-with-incorrect-cfs-lock.54345/ https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/add-cifs-storage-error.44349/

and then suddenly after 15 min it works...wierd... soon i'll be on ceph anyways...

Just experienced this issue now syslog isn't gving me anything useful i just tried removing the storage and adding it again this is the error i recieved: create storage failed: error with cfs lock 'file-storage_cfg': storage 'backups' is not online (500) at least there is a file that we...

My situation is that I have a 1u server with an internal usb port that I would like to utilize for the hypervisor because I want to use the two pcie slots for redundant vm storage. because of this I plan to use a 256GB usb (muf-256ab) so that it will have a lot of spar room for writes. I'm...

is this thread dead? I am looking at implementing the same solution, also based on this post: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/342971/can-linux-be-run-on-a-flash-drive-long-term which also refers to these articles...

yes, according to what you just stated you must still have the same vmbr setup (with the same name I assume), so it seems to me that you're trading the complexity of virtual networking for the complexity of vlans (yay), I personally would prefer not having to deal with vlans at all on the...

My topology looks like this: Does this answer your question? Do you think that this is the most optimized solution that achieves performance, redundancy and cost savings? If not, what would you suggest? P.S. this exact layout is not final, I will be making some upgrades and layout changes...

Still not sure where you're going with this? Are you trying to make the argument that there is somehow a disadvantage or limitation to stacked switches as opposed to MLAG or dual standalone switches? If so how realistic is would the disadvantage be? Is it significant enough to make a case for...

First time I have heard about this, I will look into it more. I can understand why theoretically latency would increase, but is this something that is even measurable? This is what I came up with when performing a quick test: My windows box -> standalone (cisco SG series) switch -> router...

Did this question ever get resolved, be cause I have the same question and am looking for an answer. For reference, this is my setup. vm0 connected to vmbr0,vmbr1,vmbr2,vmbr3 vm1 -> vmbr1 vm2 -> vmbr2 vm3 -> vmbr3 I need to configure these VMs for HA, how do I ensure that when they failover...

I know this is a bit old, but just out of curiosity, (I am working on a similar setup) Why not have the two switches connected in stack mode and gain the benefit of link aggregation AND redundancy? For example pve1 has port0 and port1 configured in loadbalancing (LACP or whatever switch...