Search results

I created a systemd oneshot service for this: /etc/systemd/system/nvidia-shm.service [Unit] Description=Enable NVIDIA Heterogenous Time-Slice Sizes Before=pve-guests.service After=nvidia-vgpud.service nvidia-vgpu-mgr.service [Service] Type=oneshot ExecStart=nvidia-smi vgpu -shm 1 -i 0...

Hi Daniel, thanks for the reply! not right now, no. I was just thinking ahead to the future :D Right now it is only active on two small 3-node test clusters, one of which has some Nvidia GPUs with NVAIE (yes, works the same as "normal" vGPUs, didn't experience any issues apart from the usual...

@dakralex Thank you very much for the answer! That clears things up a lot. As for the modes, I think we will just need to try the modes and see what happens. TOPSIS sounds best for our production clusters as they are usually memory limited. One thing I would have as feedback is that it is way...

@EllerholdAG my staging clusters are running no-subscription repos and there the 5.2.0 pve-ha-manager is already available. I have yet to roll it out on the enterprise ones.

Hello, I noticed that a dynamic mode was introduced to the CRS (yay! Been waiting for this for so long and it really comes in handy now with us planning our migration away from VMware, thank you so much Team!!!). I enabled it on all my testing environments and it seemed to work pretty well...

Ok, thank you for the reply. Maybe I will need to write a wrapper script to reimplement that functionality to our deploy mechanic in the meantime. For people looking for the bugzilla report: I created the feature request here: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7260

Thank you @dakralex that makes a lot of sense. That leaves the question: How does one add a single ha resource to an existing rule via the CLI?

Hi, in the past we used ha-manager add $VMID --group $groupname to be able to assign a VM to what then was a "rule" (HA Groups). With PVE 9 HA Groups have been removed in favor of affinity rules which do offer more functionality - But I am wondering how I can add a HA resource (e.g. vm:123) to...

Hi, I assume there has not been a new release of pom to publish this patch? I am still on version 0.6.7 from Sep 2024 and can't find a newer version.

Hello, I had OSD 23 on one of my hosts but the drive failed so we stopped the services and removed it. We did not need to replace it immediately (lots of OSDs in the cluster so not a lot of capacity lost) so I didn't pay much attention to it. Sometime in the last couple of months another disk...

I wanted to set up the same and discovered what is wrong here... I think the Proxmox Team has not adjusted the package to work with their management of ceph and this is the bone-stock default file paths/service names it is trying to use. It is looking for its keyring here...

Oh and I noticed that on this site https://www.proxmox.com/en/services/videos/proxmox-virtual-environment/what-s-new-in-proxmox-ve-8-1 the links to the PBS and PMG Roadmaps are dead

The changelog mentions the following: Do I automatically get to enjoy the "Reworked defaults" after upgrading to Reef or how would I apply these on existing Ceph Clusters (as the point above is about new installations)?

Hi, thank you for your work on this project, looking forward to implementing it over the next weeks. I did notice two things in the docs that are a bit outdated, maybe you could update those: https://pom.proxmox.com/offline-mirror.html#environment-variables This talks about the PBS, not POM...

Awesome! Does the new maintenance mode use the new CRS to move VMs?

Tested the pve-no-subscription repo on our staging cluster, no issues so far. Is there an ETA for it arriving in the enterprise repos so we can schedule our maintenance?

Ich gehe davon aus, dass du CephCSI (rook nutzt auch CephCSI) in K8s nutzt? Dann könntest du dir auch Kasten anschauen um Backups zu machen... Ist halt nicht PBS, aber PBS ist jetzt auch nicht grade für die Sicherung von Cloudnative Projekten designed gewesen.

Hi, seems like Dirty Pipe wasn't the only vulnerability keeping us busy this week. I got notified about these new Security Advisories from Debian: https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5095 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5096 I know Proxmox uses a modified Ubuntu Kernel but I was...

Hello, when trying to import a OVF file I get the following error: # qm importovf 500 vmname.ovf ceph01_vm [some progress notifications] import failed - cowardly refusing to overwrite existing entry: scsi0 When running it with --dryrun this is the output: { "disks" : [ {...

I have used that HBA before in the i-variant (the ports are for the backplane in the server and not exposed in the back to connect external storage) and it worked without issues. The e-variant should not be any different, it is the same board, only the position of the sas connectors differ. As...