Search results

  1. N

    Securing VM data at rest with TPM Passthrough or other options

    @dlford Are you still using this solution for windows VM's as well? If so what program in windows are you using to do the encryption?
  2. N

    Proxmox 4.2 with pfSense 2.2.6

    @crypted We had many problems in general with virtio network cards, wasn't specific to your case, but VPN would not bind to them correctly, and some custom routing would not work. I don't think BSD/pFsense has great support for them, but the e1000 work great, never had any issues with them at all.
  3. N

    Proxmox 4.2 with pfSense 2.2.6

    @crypted I've setup quite a few pfsense boxes recently with proxmox 4 and 5, and the one thing i never could get working was virtio network cards, i had to revert to using e1000 for the card type when adding the network devices, once I did this everything works with out issue. If this has...
  4. N

    Proxmox 2.3 High IOwait on 2 cpu's out of 12

    Hi, I'm trying to track down where the IOwait is coming from, 2 of the 12 cpu's in the system are almost always higher then 80% IOwait the other cpu's spike occasionally as i would expect, load on the server is hovering around 4-8 and things are responsive, however there must be a reason the...
  5. N

    How to Remove Master From Cluster 2.x

    I can't reinstall the node as it has too many clients on it to be done right now. I'm confusion is that the node things it's part of a cluster how to I tell it, it's not. pvecm status Version: 6.2.0 Config Version: 1 Cluster Name: xxxx Cluster Id: 12822 Cluster Member: Yes Cluster Generation...
  6. N

    How to Remove Master From Cluster 2.x

    Hi, I tried to setup a 2.x cluster however I quickly found out that I could not add a node if it already has environments, so now i'm stuck with a node that thinks it's a master, is there anyway I can remove it from being a master and just a stand alone node? I'm having a problem with the API...
  7. N

    WHMCS Module

    This is really good news, what functionality have you worked into the module? Can i see a demo of it from the user side by chance? Are you looking to sell the module?
  8. N

    WHMCS Module

    Hi, We've tried to use allVPS before as well and it has a lot of bugs as far as I can tell, it's not a very robust module as of yet. We are waiting for version 2.0 of proxmox to finish so that an proper module for proxmox can be created using the API that's being developed.
  9. N

    Proxmox 1.9 Memory Usage Doesn't add up

    Hi, Yes i see the memory usage is looking the same, for some reason i thought it was different so that's fine, i'm just curious about the KSM and how it comes into play, it says it's working and has shared pages but it doesn't seem to reflect that very much. I could be wrong though. xxx:~#...
  10. N

    Proxmox 1.9 Memory Usage Doesn't add up

    NM it's doing the same thing, just on the new 1.9 server KSM shows this Every 2.0s: cat /sys/kernel/mm/ksm/pages_sharing Thu Sep 29 12:29:21 2011 425967 Which if my math is right is 1663MB of shared pages? I'm just...
  11. N

    Proxmox 1.9 Memory Usage Doesn't add up

    Hi, Ok so I've created a few new 1.9 servers and migrated some virtual machines to them. Everything is working fine but I'm not sure how memory usage is calculated from the output below used + free + buffers + cached is more than the total, which is confusing me to no end, also KSM says it's...
  12. N

    OpenVZ: Quota's within VE

    Hi Florian, Did you reboot the VM after enabling User Quota's? You need to do this as quota's can't be enabled on a running VM, the settings are set but don't become active until you reboot the VM. Thanks, Nick D. Canhost.ca
  13. N

    KVM-VM Live-Migration fails

    That's an easy one, your new node doesn't have VT enabled in the bios. Could not access KVM kernel module: No such file or directory failed to initialize KVM: No such file or directory No accelerator found! The KVM will not start with out VT support. Nick D. Canhost.ca
  14. N

    Are Portmap/ Portsentry needed for normal operation on the host OS?

    Hi, We do regular security scan's of our system and recently the scans of been detecting portmap (port 111) and portsentry as a possible security problem. If they are not needed i'd like to shut them down, but i'm not 100% sure if they are needed for normal operation. Nick D.
  15. N

    VLAN setup

    Fair enough, i don't want to be on it either, but for now it's working until i figure out how to get it working with the .32 kernel. If anyone has any suggestions for us please let us know.
  16. N

    VLAN setup

    @mvrhov: what kernel are you using, i have the exact same setup (and had the same problem) when I was using 2.6.32, as soon as i changed to 2.6.18 everything works fine. I don't know what the difference is, and I wish that someone would tel me how to set it up for 2.6.32 because i'd like to use...
  17. N

    Proxmox 1.7 - 2.6.32 - Setting up two different networks on two different eth devices

    Re: Proxmox 1.7 - 2.6.32 - Setting up two different networks on two different eth dev Now to answer my own question, took some time but i got it working. This is what i did. # network interface settings auto lo iface lo inet loopback iface eth0 inet manual iface eth1 inet manual...
  18. N

    Proxmox 1.7 - 2.6.32 - Setting up two different networks on two different eth devices

    I know this issue has been discussed before but I can't find anything in the forums that's the same setup as I have. networking config is like this network interface settings auto lo iface lo inet loopback iface eth0 inet manual iface eth1 inet manual auto vmbr0 iface vmbr0...
  19. N

    pveperf not finishing

    Hi, Been using proxmox for a while now and just trying to see if i can tweak the performance a bit more, but for some reason when i run pveperf it keeps failing, see below: pm101:~# pveperf /dev/mapper/pve-data CPU BOGOMIPS: 42636.54 REGEX/SECOND: 409284 HD SIZE...
  20. N

    Strange Inconsistency

    Hi, Ok so i have a server 2003 VM that's a fresh install on proxmox 1.5. It's configured with 1 socket and 2 cores and none of the para virtualized drivers. performance seems fine. i'm just getting some inconsistency with the reporting on cpu usage, system idle process is showing 98-99 %...