Sure, here is the whole log of the verification job and version of the software - it is the newest version of the 2.X from no-subscription repo. The verify job is running right now, so i will update after it ends.
Hello there,
recently i had backup of LXC running (from ProxmoxVE) but it got interrupted by electricity outage. Now i cant see the backup anywhere, it does not existi in GUI, neither in filesystem directory, but it is getting verified for some reason, which leads to verification error.
I...
All disks completed the test without error.
I have used command smartctl -t long /dev/sd[a-f]
Right now, there is no issue, because since restart of the server, i have not made a rollbacke on that LXC.
Hello,
previous week i faced the issue of process zfs unmount stuck while proceeding rollback of LXC. After that, also incoming replication got stuck (zfs receive).
I though allright, its been long time since restart and there was new kernel and zfs installed but system was not rebooted. So i...
My bad, -r flag had to be in previous command zfs destroy -r rpool/data/vm-119-disk-0-old
I'll edit it in my previous post, so people who find this will get it right.
Yeah, snapshots were the same. Replication was not set up for this VM
I think i got everything i needed.
Thank you very much...
Well, i have used this command zfs send -Rp rpool/data/vm-172-disk-1 | zfs recv rpool/data/vm-172-disk-1-new but it didnt work, so i found out, that i need to create snapshot first and send the snapshot. Apparently there is not need for -o compression=on, because its already present on dataset...
Well i checked out how to use zfs send and zfs recv, but iam still not 100% sure and i really dont want to screw anything up.
Is this procedure with -R option right?
zfs send -R rpool/data/vm-172-disk-1 | zfs recv rpool/data/vm-172-disk-1-new
zfs rename rpool/data/vm-172-disk-1...
Oh, good point.
So i will set zfs set compression=on rpool/data on destination and if i get it right, i need to delete the replication and subvol-150-disk-0 dataset to start it freshly with compression enabled. Is there any possibility to compress other VM/CT datasets so i can prevent problems...
I did not do anything, pool is showing that i can upgrade for some time, but i did not proceed.
The same thing happened on other proxmox server with different container so i tried to delete the replication (it destroyed CTs dataset too) and set it up again, but it did not helped and ended with...
Thank you for trying to help.
Looks like there is planty of free space on the pool.
root@backup:~$ zfs list -o space rpool
NAME AVAIL USED USEDSNAP USEDDS USEDREFRESERV USEDCHILD
rpool 4.23T 11.1T 0B 140K 0B 11.1T
root@backup:~$ zpool list rpool
NAME SIZE...
Hello
There are not set quotas on rpool or rpool/data
Iam running proxmox VE 6.3-6, details bellow
Iam planning upgrade to 6.4-x at friday, but i dont expect it to fix this problem.
Hello,
we are having problem with host replication.
The host have 16GB disk, which is about 25% full. But when replication starts,after 2GB trasnfered it ends with an error cannot receive incremental stream: destination rpool/data/subvol-150-disk-0 space quota exceeded
The error is about space...
Some of them do have same problems (problems happens 100% on servers which contain logs about blocked tasks from previous post). And some have even same hardware.
Disks are mostly in hotswap front positions, but some of the servers does not have hotswap positions, so its connected internally...
Hi, here are details you asked for.
On another servers we have similar issues with blocked tasks with different Samsung disks
Samsung_SSD_860_PRO_1TB and Samsung_SSD_860_EVO_1TB
About resources, nothing looks unusual...on server with 80%+ RAM and 50-70% CPU wearout there are no errors but...
Hello,
we are having problems with proxmox servers, our server sometimes freeze or something and does not work for like 2-10 minutes until he unfreeze and continue work...our monitoring system is reporting these freezes, because the server does not respond to ping.
In log we found "INFO: task...
Hello and thank you for response.
I compared snapshots on main host and replicated host, both are the same, but new replication already did ran, so its probably pointless to compare it right now, when it works...i try it when it "fails".
What do you mean by "compare on both sides with list"?
Hello, we are facing problems with replication.
Like once a month, our container replication is doing "full sync" instead of "incremental sync".
The container have few hundreds of GB so its really annoying.
Why it is doing full sync when initial full sync already happened.
Thanks for any advice.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.