Search results

  1. D

    Proxmox 7.4 NAT / iptables problem

    It seems a hairpinning issue, but I can't manage to solve it, any idea?
  2. D

    Proxmox 7.4 NAT / iptables problem

    I'm having a weird behavior since the migration from the latest 7.3 to 7.4-3 I have a proxmox hosted server (OVH) with a single public IPV4. I have a single LXC container and on the host a list of NAT and ip forwarding settings so most of the requests (http, https, smtp, imap,...) are natted to...
  3. D

    Performance issues with OpenMediaVault VM (ZFS/LUKS...)

    Compression could still be usefull as I plan to use a directory (passed to the CT) or a samba share from the host, the files will be stored natively on the ZFS volume. In fact I already discovered that the compression is useful. After my rsync from the OMV volume to the ZFS volume, the result is...
  4. D

    Performance issues with OpenMediaVault VM (ZFS/LUKS...)

    (I didn't specified it but) My NTFS drive was encrypted using Bitlocker before, and the processor didn't have AES_NI instructions ! For real world performance (sorry I hadn't understood your question), I face almost every kind of situations, for example I often make sync backups of photos from...
  5. D

    Performance issues with OpenMediaVault VM (ZFS/LUKS...)

    Yes most of the time I use the samba share on the OMV (not OVH :) ) VM. For performance tests purposes I always use big files. As I explained in the first post I mostly use one 4GB file. For example when I was writing to a samba share on my old J1900 computer which was using Windows (before...
  6. D

    Performance issues with OpenMediaVault VM (ZFS/LUKS...)

    I'm sorry if I used the wrong words... it's not exactly easy to understand all the imbricated layers on that disk :) By "passed a Virtio SCSI volume of almost all the available space to my OMV VM" I mean that I created a volume for the OMV VM using the regular way : In the VM "hardware"...
  7. D

    Performance issues with OpenMediaVault VM (ZFS/LUKS...)

    the tap interface seems to be a "false positive", yes it says 2799% but... of a 10 Mbps interface! which is in reality 279Mbps. On a 1Gbps interface it is not that much. The disk is LUKS>ZFS then inside is a virtio SCSI volume passed to the OMV VM then formatted in ext4 inside the VM. I have...
  8. D

    Performance issues with OpenMediaVault VM (ZFS/LUKS...)

    screenshot of atop (on the proxmox host) during a copy from myc pc to the samba share of the OMV VM
  9. D

    Performance issues with OpenMediaVault VM (ZFS/LUKS...)

    The J1900 is not the "main server", only a second node just used for backup in case the first node crashes. The J1900 node is powered off 99% of the time
  10. D

    Performance issues with OpenMediaVault VM (ZFS/LUKS...)

    Hi For a home server/nas I'm using the latests versions of Proxmox (5.4) and OMV (4.1.22-1) on recent hardware (core i3-8100, 16gb of ram, installed on a ssd...). I have only one 8TB hard-drive with no raid configuration for my data storage. I use my previous server (intel Atom J1900, 8GB of...

About

The Proxmox community has been around for many years and offers help and support for Proxmox VE, Proxmox Backup Server, and Proxmox Mail Gateway.
We think our community is one of the best thanks to people like you!

Get your subscription!

The Proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise support. Tens of thousands of happy customers have a Proxmox subscription. Get yours easily in our online shop.

Buy now!