Search results

@Stoiko Ivanov , as i also have struggled hours with this, too - could we perhaps make lsblk perhaps make more "robust" against failure like the above, if the param which defines the access order for lsblk is changed and blkid is being used first ? --properties-by blkid,udev,file from the...

mh. came across this one. but for me , it doesn't even work after using "reset" in efi bios https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2599 i'm out of ideas. setting in grub cmdline to kern.vt.fb.default_mode=1024x786 or efi_max_resolution="1024x768" doesn't have any effect, too. i...

@t.lamprecht @giner , i have created a reproducer for the issue to make this happen without O_DIRECT write by user - but just by accessing memory and make system swap/thrash i have done so because there wer some complaints that "you aren't allow to submit direct_io this way" , for example on...

Hello, i use proxmox from macbook retina, which has very high display resolution. i setup uefi vm to check some details of XCP-ng hypervisor, but though i set display resolution to 1024x768 in uefi bios settings of VM (Device Manager -> OVMF Platform Configuration), the linux of XCP-ng boots...

that error must be also cause by different reason, as i see this from time to time on non-clustered host, too.

ok. i should stop wasting my time by digging into issues with totally outdated proxmox versions.... https://lore.proxmox.com/all/20210706095026.3785241-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com/

maybe yes | pvesh create ..... is worth a try? not sure, if pve9 made a progress with this issue, as i don't know how to reproduce this one. anyhow, i searched a bit and that "PMBR signature detected" message seems to originate from "lvcreate", which should be used under the hood. lvcreate...

it seems there is no mention about the pve clustering - just setting up the drbd mirroring. so i have difficulties in understanding how this can work, as we need three nodes minimum with proxmox pve.

yes, but i don't want to test something which is at "experimental" state with totally outdated version and old/resolved bugs, so i'd like to use recent dkms version as announced at https://www.patreon.com/posts/dkms-migration-139949871

good to hear, i was just asking myself how to get to 6.16+ for being able to test with bcachefs dkms package, which needs 6.16 at minimum.

i cannot answer your specific question, but at https://ubuntu.com/certified/202302-31272 there is information that this server is certified with ubuntu. and proxmox is using ubuntu kernel

yes, there is a long thread for this already at https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/slow-memory-leak-in-6-8-12-13-pve.168961/

you can also try this method https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-server-via-wifi-list-of-wifi-bridge-adapters-which-work-with-proxmox.161124/

you may try this way: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-server-via-wifi-list-of-wifi-bridge-adapters-which-work-with-proxmox.161124/

eine weitere möglichkeit besteht darin einen router zu verwenden, der den client/bridge mode beherrscht. d.h. du machst das wifi nicht auf dem pve host sondern verbindest den host via lan mit dem router im client/bridge mode. es werden noch erfahrungswerte/berichte gesucht von leuten die das...

yes, i think this is a better aproach instead of struggling with local wifi adapters & issues. have a look at https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-server-via-wifi-list-of-wifi-bridge-adapters-which-work-with-proxmox.161124/ and report your own findings/experience with different wifi...

deine beschreibung klingt etwas wirr beschreib dein setup bitte als erstes mal etwas genauer wo ist das proxmox installiert und wie genau? partitionstabelle und zpool infos wären hilfreich

>Warum setzt man ein System in der Firma auf, was man nur mit KI eingerichtet bekommen hat weil mit KI jetzt jeder alles kann

da die website im wartungsmodus ist - was kostet denn der spass?

> Given the setup and the fact that it directly impacts the Intel E810 NIC, I also suspect it’s tied to the ice driver changes introduced in those newer kernels yes, seems so: https://securityvulnerability.io/vulnerability/CVE-2025-21981...