Search results

Should I upgrade first the get the license or license first then upgrade. How is upgrading to version 5 going to effect the real time operation of the VMs running on the ceph cluster? Do I shut everything off and upgrade all three nodes? Or can I upgrade one node, migrate the VMs to the new...

While running a VM on Cluster of three systems using CEPH on Virtual Environment 4.4-1/eb2d6f1e. The VM upgraded to Linux kernel 2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 and would not boot. Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount fs on unknown-block(0,0) In order to get the VM to boot had to use...

your network is disrupted, only the quorate network partition can write to the cluster filesystem this node cannot reach the other two via corosync unless you fix the network, you cannot write to /etc/pve OK the issue was two of them were plugged into a cisco gig switch and the third one was...

Aug 23 11:31:45 pteranode3 systemd[1]: Starting The Proxmox VE cluster filesystem... Aug 23 11:31:45 pteranode3 pmxcfs[43643]: [status] notice: update cluster info (cluster name pteracluster, version = 3) Aug 23 11:31:45 pteranode3 pmxcfs[43643]: [dcdb] notice: members: 2/43643 Aug 23 11:31:45...

root@pteracluster:~# pvecm status Quorum information ------------------ Date: Thu Aug 23 11:11:01 2018 Quorum provider: corosync_votequorum Nodes: 2 Node ID: 0x00000001 Ring ID: 1/308 Quorate: Yes Votequorum information ----------------------...

root@pteranode3:/etc/pve/local# pvecm status Quorum information ------------------ Date: Thu Aug 23 11:04:53 2018 Quorum provider: corosync_votequorum Nodes: 1 Node ID: 0x00000002 Ring ID: 2/1704 Quorate: No Votequorum information...

Yes I thought about that - eveything is pingable. The 10.10.10.0 subnet is 10gig modules plugged into Dell 10gig switch The 69.28.32.0 subnet is a cisco gig switch root@pteranode3:/etc/pve/local# ping 10.10.10.1 PING 10.10.10.1 (10.10.10.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.10.10.1...

So I thought I would change the permissions so I could manually put the commands in but the system will not let me chmod either root@pteranode3:/etc/pve/local# chmod 600 host.fw chmod: changing permissions of âhost.fwâ: Function not implemented This system is being used for NTP DDOS attacks...

More info root@pteranode3:/etc/pve/local# ls -al total 2 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root www-data 0 Dec 26 2016 . dr-xr-xr-x 2 root www-data 0 Dec 26 2016 .. -r--r----- 1 root www-data 22 Jan 22 2018 host.fw -r--r----- 1 root www-data 83 Mar 23 03:11 lrm_status dr-xr-xr-x 2 root www-data 0...

unable to open file '/etc/pve/local/host.fw.tmp.2630' - Permission denied (500) Firewall has started on the other two nodes of the cluster. But when I try to add a rule I get the error message above. I also tried rebooting the node. The datacenter says the node is offline and yet I can log into...

Virtual Environment 4.4-1/eb2d6f1e Three node cluster. Ceph Health_OK Datacenter reports node 3 Offline under HA status. lrm pteranode3 (old timestamp - dead?, Fri Mar 23 03:11:35 2018) On pteranode3 pve-ha-lrm status running pve-ha-crm status running date Thu Jul 5 10:25:52 PDT 2018 I do not...

My guess is the one that fixes the MON_GETLIST vurnerability

That looks like the same thing as http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/ntp/ntp_4.2.6.p5+dfsg-7+deb8u2_changelog So I am sorry I have no clue what you are telling me to do :-(

Ok Now I just need to figure out how to back port the CVE fixes. Thansk

The version running on my 3 node proxmox 4.4 cluster is 4.2.6p5 and was recently used for a NTP Amplification Attack - I tried apt-get update then apt-get upgrade ntp but it still comes back as 4.2.6p5 - the vulnerability was fixed in 4.2.7 - how do I get my ntp up to date so it can not be...

I have a three node cluster with the vm100 stored on the disk image ID rd_drive Type RBD on Proxmox 4.4 I looked at all three nodes trying to find the file directories in attempt to renumber the vm but could not find any. All three nodes show no folders under /var/lib/vz/images and...

OK well funny thing is I already config (3) R720 systems with 300 gig drives - but the boss wanted outside input before we spend the money on bigger drives. So if I follow you I should take one of three systems down to the other location and check if they still sync over the ten gig fiber link?

I forgot to mention there is a 10Gig fiber connection between the two locations

So asking those who have done this before, we want to have redundant servers running our CRM - would like to have them in two physically different locations so if one facility blew up we would still have access to our CRM software. Using Proxmox 4 what would be the best why to design this...

I originally setup my ceph cluster machines with 2 disks raid one for the Proxmox install and the other 6 drives as a raid array which I used for the cepf OSD. I later read that ceph works better if you do not do raid so I removed the raid config for the 6 drive. But when I rebooted the node...