Search results

Thanks for another great (pre-)release! For BTRFS I found only the "@"-thing in the release notes. Is there anything else and is BTRFS still technologypreview with PVE 8?

Maybe you can look into the thread I made regarding these quirks (and add to it, if you find workarounds or so...).

Sounds well-thought-out, thanks for the insight!

Not a complaint, just curious: any special reason why btrfs isn't in the pbs-installer like it is in the pve-installer?

nofail is indeed something which helps that the system boots (btrfs mount only used for non-system-files here). But it doesn't mount the filesystem. The options: subvol=blah,degraded,nofail - when I log in and type mount /mnt/blah it mounts without issues (in degraded state). This behaviour...

A paid or a paying user? SCNR :-D but "paid user" sounds like the proxmox-staff pays you to use it. For the other points: you're absolutely right, absolute awesome piece of software!

I've just set up a pve7 in a VM again to test a bit more: PVE-Root installed on ext4 disk, so nothing special. Added disks and made a btrfs-raid1 which is mounted via fstab. Detach a disk, so the array becomes degraded and reboot. System hangs for a while, then the emergencyshell appears because...

That escalated quickly ;-) Haven't thought the stable version is that near, thank you for another great release!

In the rescueshell it worked, in the initramfs it didn't - or it was kind of late that day, I'll try that again. Thank you, it looks wrong to me, too, to have it generally. But that btrfs won't boot degraded as almost every other raid-whatever-implementation does feels weird, too. Good point...

I am playing around with btrfs at the moment. What I haven't understood yet how to deal with degraded arrays: First I tried to install PBS in a VM, rootfs on ext4, so nothing special. Installed kernel 5.11 and btrfs-progs from backports. Made three disks and put them into a raid1-array with...

The "EFI disks stored on Ceph now use the writeback caching-mode" is supposed to be in the actual beta, isn't it? I have a host upgraded from 6.4 to 7-beta and created newly a VM. However in <VMID>.conf-file the EFI-entry has no "writeback" in it. It takes long time to boot. When modifying the...

And you rely on this naminscheme from the sdn-scripts, makes sense, therefore I tried that version. Thanks. Ah, that was the part I didn't know and that explains it, thanks so much! Looks good. So the only thing I have to take care of then is not chaning/deleting that interface in sdn. But as...

Hi Alexandre, I try to get my feet wet in SDN however, there is one thing where I don't know how it is supposed to be now. After migrating my OVS-setup to linux-bridge-setup I have the following situation: I like to use a VLAN on the proxmox-host and to the VMs. Traffic is coming in tagged. The...

I am running a PVE 5-Cluster with Ceph bluestore OSDs. They are only HDD OSDs and connected over 2x1GBit bonds. Don't get me wrong here, it isn't productive yet and I don't expect any fancy performance out of this setup. I am highly impressed with the performance of it under Linux-KVMs and when...

That's awesome!

Also a suggestion, would work for me. And I think if you deleted the @ accidentally for the first time when using HP ILO you will take enough care :-D

Sounds like more good options.

I think it is the only place during install where a special character is needed IIRC, so eventually it could really be an option to modify the installer here. I have this issue every time I like to try things out on my microservers (they are dead cheap and good for that, although I am not an HP...

I experienced the problem with the @ and HP ILO, too. It's a pain. It comes to my mind that I asked myself in that situation if the installer couldn't just make the email-field in to parts ______@_____ so the @ is already there.

Thank you tom, I have really missed the 119,90 Euro or had it wiped out of my head (?) althoug I remember the big discussion about introducing the subscriptions. The ability to get a more-year-subscription is also very nice. But about future price-strategy there is nothing you can say...