Search results

  1. A

    Proxmox 5.4/6 Threadripper not working with EPYC/host profile

    Update : This seems to work . Non-hpet also enables Debian 10 to work in Epicmode However : Ubuntu desktop gives a garbled desktopscreen when booting
  2. A

    Proxmox 5.4/6 Threadripper not working with EPYC/host profile

    Can that be put in the configfile (101.conf) as well?
  3. A

    Proxmox 5.4/6 Threadripper not working with EPYC/host profile

    Update : FreeBSD 11 does work , FreeBSD 12 hangs with the EPYC or host-cpuprofile Fedora 30 works Running Fedora 30 nested : FreeBSD 12 works as well Qemuversion on that : 3.1.0-9.fc30 pgrep -fa 'kvm|qemu' 2686 /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -name guest=freebsd12.0,debug-threads=on -S -ob...
  4. A

    Proxmox 5.4/6 Threadripper not working with EPYC/host profile

    Fair enough , but 12 did work on the Fedora , i am reproducing it in a vm with Fedora now Results will we posted later on
  5. A

    Proxmox 5.4/6 Threadripper not working with EPYC/host profile

    That is impossible unfortunately , the Fedora box got reinstalled with proxmox ... :(
  6. A

    Proxmox 5.4/6 Threadripper not working with EPYC/host profile

    Well , this FreeBSD worked flawless with the EPYC cputype on Fedora 30 though And i see the same weird behaviour with Debian , Ubuntu and even Arch
  7. A

    Proxmox 5.4/6 Threadripper not working with EPYC/host profile

    qm config 100 bootdisk: virtio0 cores: 1 cpu: EPYC hotplug: disk,network memory: 8192 name: BSD net0: virtio=FE:87:95:5E:29:09,bridge=vmbr0,firewall=1 numa: 0 ostype: other sata0: local:iso/FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso,media=cdrom,size=871550K scsihw: virtio-scsi-single smbios1...
  8. A

    Proxmox 5.4/6 Threadripper not working with EPYC/host profile

    After switching it from opteron G3 to EPYC (So i could make the screenshot) Jul 08 19:14:30 pve pvedaemon[1721]: <root@pam> update VM 100: -cores 1 -cpu EPYC -delete vcpus,cpulimit,cpuunits -numa 0 -sockets 1 Jul 08 19:14:30 pve pvedaemon[1721]: cannot delete 'vcpus' - not set in current...
  9. A

    Proxmox 5.4/6 Threadripper not working with EPYC/host profile

    This hangs with the EPYC/host profile (it just hangs forever on the USB, while the generic kvm64 works)
  10. A

    Proxmox 5.4/6 Threadripper not working with EPYC/host profile

    Reformatted the code , i mean with booting poorly : They either hang or crash :)
  11. A

    Proxmox 5.4/6 Threadripper not working with EPYC/host profile

    Hi guys , The following issue (It works on Fedora 30 with KVM though) : On both Proxmox 5.4 and 6 i can't get VM's to boot properly with the EPYC or host-cpuprofile With KVM64 or Opteron G3 it works My setup : # pveversion --verbose proxmox-ve: 6.0-1 (running kernel: 5.0.15-1-pve) pve-manager...
  12. A

    Centos5

    You really don't want to use Centos 5.x now ... support for this has ended 31th of March 2017
  13. A

    Nexenta/Illumos-based slow

    It is NexentaStor 4.0.4 , the current one. I've turned off ACPI , just for testing purposes ( It was slow before anyway ). I will try your config as soon as I get home from work :) Thanks for your time for now :)
  14. A

    Nexenta/Illumos-based slow

    @ the moment I am @ work so I don't have access . I can give you the details that I remember : 3 sockets with 1 vcpu ( Could not get it to work with 1 socket and 3 Vcpu's) Virtio raw disk 20 gig , writeback. Virtio NIC. ACPI Off , KVM 1 , Solaris OS type. 6 Gigs ram. Cputype = host scsihw =...
  15. A

    Nexenta/Illumos-based slow

    This used to work in an esxi setup before though , with quite fast performance. But this remark doesn't solve my problem though :) Why is Solaris this slow on my setup? :) Even without the intention to make it a storage VM , the performance is really bad.
  16. A

    Nexenta/Illumos-based slow

    I want to make a Nexenta or at least Illumos-based ZFS storage which i intend to pass back to proxmox over iSCSI. The VM is really slow , especially noticeable when connecting to the webinterface of that VM. It has been configured with 3 Vcpu's and 6 Gigs ram for now , my ZFS array will be...
  17. A

    Nexenta/Illumos-based slow

    Has anyone managed to get this working? With or withour Virtio disks/nic's it just takes ages to get into the webinterface CPU : AMD FX8320 , 16 Gigs of ram pveversion -v proxmox-ve: 4.0-16 (running kernel: 4.2.2-1-pve) pve-manager: 4.0-50 (running version: 4.0-50/d3a6b7e5)...

About

The Proxmox community has been around for many years and offers help and support for Proxmox VE, Proxmox Backup Server, and Proxmox Mail Gateway.
We think our community is one of the best thanks to people like you!

Get your subscription!

The Proxmox team works very hard to make sure you are running the best software and getting stable updates and security enhancements, as well as quick enterprise support. Tens of thousands of happy customers have a Proxmox subscription. Get yours easily in our online shop.

Buy now!