Search results

it would be nice to have this in the gui.

Other than this specific error, the Ryzen platform has been very stable for me the last year on proxmox, except Windows 11, but i made the decision early on to buy Asrock X570 server boards. Consumer boards has been a disater for me.

same issue here with Windows 11 on: CPU(s) 12 x AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor (1 Socket) Kernel Version Linux 5.13.19-2-pve #1 SMP PVE 5.13.19-4 (Mon, 29 Nov 2021 12:10:09 +0100) PVE Manager Version pve-manager/7.1-8/5b267f33 i was running with cpu = host - i have now...

To everyone thinking they can do this and ends up in grub like me. i recovered with a live ubuntu 20.04 imported the dataset with zpool import rpool -f zfs destroy rpool/dataset zpool export rpool and then restarted, that worked.

How did you remove that dataset from grub ? or did you use usb drive with the iso to mount it ?

Hey, i experience exactly the same thing on all consumer grade ssd i have ever tested Samsung 840/850 evo / pro or Intel 600p and so on. What is even worse they all get “relocated sectors counts” and wear out rise fairly qucickly. I even manged to destroy a intel 600p in 2 month as root pool on...

I just saw this and have a though, the ssd's you use what are these ? When i first was introduced to zfs i thought that running on any fast consumer ssd like Samsung 950 evo and pro was good enough, we had several 1tb disks i raid 1. we found out the hard way that every ssd we owned was not...

same issue here.

@fabian , Do you have any estimation on when native zfs encryption does land in proxmox ? :) what exact version of zfs is this in ?

Hey, since it was not possible for me to find anything on the internet on running containers in pure ram, i found a simple solution just to use of lvm on top of ram. i hope this can be useful for anyone, use at your own risk. Since ram is not persistent you container will die on a reboot, but...

i tried just for the fun to se how well a kvm/vm would perform on a directory mounted on tmpfs, ohh my it is fast. i am seeing - almost 7gb write and read speeds. to overcome the non persistent nature of ram i i have configured proxmox to make a backup on a persistent disk every night. When a...

i bought a pair of Intel DC S3710 - 400 GB - they are now runnung as the rpool, i can now achieve seq writes of 350MB+

thanks lnxbill & Joshin for your answer. i will defiantly try this test that lnxbill posted on our hw, as for your setup is that on a mirror, ? and what kind of make/models? if both of you should give a advice in buying 2x performance grade solid-state drive to use in a mirror as the rpool...

i think it is hard to point at one specific benchmark to get real world performance. my use case is regular file storage and vm's for the regular storage i think bonnie++ gives a good indication of how it performs. for the vm i have no idea what a good test would be i tried both bonnie and...

Update: i got a new server to test on. :) The new server is a 1u with a Supermicro X10SDV-4C-TLN2F motherboard with a Xeon D 1521 CPU, 32GB Registered Ram and 2x brand new 1tb Samung 850 evo drives, that i configured as a mirror i reinstalled everything from scratch with the drives as ahci...

i have no way to test more than the 32 g that i had in the last server that also had io issues.

---- thanks for this reply, your are on to something, i have tested with many different dekstop ssd with almost the same performance, on different hw so the only thing i did'ent change was the use of desktop ssd's. it is sad that the performance is so low on that type on of hardware, maybe i...

update: tried a clean install on a different server with 2 x 2tb disk in a mirror, this is completely different hardware with 32 gb ram and a xeon 1231 and zfs still create massive io delays when writing to disk, the disk are no way near the raw disk performance of a single disk and the system...

i thought i would try a clean install with only the 2 Samsung 850 evo SSD's i still se the same performance issues NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 sda2 ONLINE 0 0 0...