Search results

Thank you very much for your clarification. I only have seen the PR of ZFS expansion. I thought if TrueNAS uses this functionality that it is stable already. I understand that Proxmox doesn't distribute an RC version. I will recreate the ZFS pool.

As you probably know ZFS supports attaching a new disk to an existing raidz1 vdev since autoumn 2023. A feature flag named "raidz_epansion" must be enabled. see pull request ZFS on Github. Truenas already supports the expansion already officially. Therefore it should be stable. I tried to set...

I tried to start with timeout of 300s as Fiona proposed. The VM have needed 42 seconds to start. As Comune di Levico proposed it would be good to extend the standard timeout or let us set a timeout property. Thank you very much for your hint.

We have a VM with 16 network interfaces. Therefore the entry list has a lot of characters. With this VM we never had an issue. Since last update to current verision (see below) the VM stops starting with error "failed: got timeout". If I delete some networks or another line (eg. ide2 CD) then it...

That's logically because would you develop (not only maintain) a plugin for another software component which isn't from Proxmox? Shall Linbit or Ceph project provides PVE GUI pages to manage their cluster? This isn't realistic. My experience for best practice is a well documented API (for...

Hi together I think you aren't talking from same issue. Tom has right concerning the plugin for current version. It's working because Linbit took it from Proxmox's repo just as is. But for mid and long term I support Titux's statement. Linbit has no interest develop the plugin in future. We...

LnxBil Thanks for your tip. For what? For PBX (Asterisk), some phone (via PoE), Switche and router. I need to run PBX infrastructure for about 60 min. after power loss. There are two reasons: a) evacuation announcement to phones via multicast and b) emergency call from elevators to support...

For most cases / vms you are right. Orderly shutdown is necessary for all servers at the end. I only want to let run the asterisk based PBX (+switch/+router) as long UPC reaches 10% of power (ca. 1 hour). Running "half" cluster combined with manual recovery (important) isn't so risky. In my...

Thanks for your answer. I know about HA 4 functionality but I hesitate to use it caused by some disadvantages. The manual transfer from a "dead" server to a running server within a cluster is secure, because I know if a server is really down or not. So this "half" HA allows running one server...

I run a cluster with three nodes (quorum is given) normally. The VM's are synchronized with DRBD or on NAS share (uncritical VMs). HA groups aren't used at the moment (I'm still in trial and learning status with this functionality.) Yesterday I had a crash on node2 caused by a driver. I was...