Search results

Hi, please consider adding the backup, validation and verify speed of backups to Proxmox Backup Server roadmap it's take very long time for backup steps, even if I have Disks Samsung Etnerprise NVMe 7.5Gbps read speed and even if I did for tests backups to NVMe array, with 7Gbps write for each...

thanks for your info! with 6.5.13-6-pve it's working well so it's Kernel related any suggestion how to fix it on new Kernels? Kind Regards,

thanks for your response! Unfortunately, the problem also exists in kernel version 6.11 other suggestions? Kind Regards,

Hi @dakralex Thanks for your feedback! I have following boot menu options: Screenshot 2025-01-20 140404.png 5.15.149-1 6.8.4-3 6.8.12-5 on 5.15.149-1 backup working well on all new, it's show error and failed, show errors on screenshots Please advice. Kind Regards,

Hi @dakralex yes, new version introduce this error, before this upgrade I was working with 7.4.x and backups was working well versions: root@node404:~# pveversion -v proxmox-ve: 8.3.0 (running kernel: 6.8.12-5-pve) pve-manager: 8.3.2 (running version: 8.3.2/3e76eec21c4a14a7)...

thanks, I did for 20 seconds and check new backup, same issue suggestions? Kind Regards,

Dear @dakralex thanks for your response! attached additional error messages: 2025-01-14T08:47:05.359511+01:00 node404 kernel: [ 7657.161991] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2 2025-01-14T08:47:05.359523+01:00 node404 kernel: [ 7657.162495] DMAR: [DMA Read NO_PASID] Request device [5e:00.3]...

Hi, we using Proxmox updated version: 8.3.2 (we did now upgrade from 7.4.x) in env with Broadcom BCM57504 NetXtreme-E 10Gb/25Gb on Dell Server we using remote iscsi over iser storage and pbs for backups, the problem is that each time we have backup for disks > 100Gb it's stop, Hangs the server...

it's show 256 cores, count from 0 to 255 btw, Something else interesting, if I disable the logical cores option on bios and count only "physical" cores, it's show 128 and not 127 it's should consider some proxmox gui should fix and count 1-256 instead of 0-255?

Hi, I have some Proxmox 7.4.x ENV with 2x AMD 7763 CPUs and I see 256 Cores, and on another new Proxmox 8.1 I see only 255 Cores for same AMD CPU model 7763 Suggestions? any setting that related to missing core? Thanks!

Hi, IBM recommendation is to work with minimum of 8 volumes (and even with 16) we have 4 iSCSI Ports so 8x4 it's 32 "Disks". I also create tickets with IBM but so far we on "Unsupported Linux OS" Kind Regards,

Hi, 1. it's look like the segfault is not the problem, it's happen only in one node of 4 nodes, all other nodes no segfault issue. from my tests today, I see that problem is tarting after first controller is boot, up, even before we touch or shutdown the second controller. the error repeated on...

Hi, thanks for your feedbacks! 1. yes, it's happen one time and am able to restore it with shutdown of the controllers, it's important to know multipath working well to know that High availability mechanism will cover me in case of failure. 2. attaching some related logs: ./messages:Nov 7...

thanks for your feedback! we have Flashsystem 5200 and we set it according to Ubuntu: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/flashsystem-5x00/8.6.x?topic=system-settings-linux-hosts Kind Regards,

sure, here: # multipath -ll mpath1 (000000000000019) dm-32 IBM,2145 size=20T features='1 queue_if_no_path' hwhandler='1 alua' wp=rw |-+- policy='service-time 0' prio=50 status=active | |- 5:0:0:0 sdaq 66:160 active ready running | `- 6:0:0:0 sdar 66:176 active ready running `-+-...

Hello everyone, we have IBM 5200 Flashsystem storage with 2 Controllers, each controller have 2x 25Gbps connections this storage have 8 volumes so I have 8x wwids each wwid is represented 4 times on all 4 ports total of 32 devices under sdXX we created 8 volumes on proxmox connected to the...

Hi, Proxmox v7.3 including Framework for remote migration to cluster-external Proxmox VE hosts it's possible to work with that already or should wait for next releases? I didn't find any related docs yet... thanks!

Hello everyone, one of my nodes Dealing with large amounts of requests and from time to time I see that I have timeout on ping test for both host node and guests VMs checking /var/log/syslog show: Sep 11 20:42:32 node01 kernel: [5117056.047088] net_ratelimit: 31765 callbacks suppressed Sep 11...

Hello Team, about BTRFS, there is any plan to create GUI manage for it like Proxmox have for LVM, LVM-Thin, Direcotry and ZFS? I have seen btrfs storage plugin on Roadmap, this not refer to gui manage? waiting until technology preview will done? any estimate / detailed info about that? Thanks!

thanks!