Search results

That doesn't contradict anything I said. I was answering to someone that said that they were just using lvm+ext4, and I said that with such configuration they will not be able to use HA. I'm myself using ZFS for the shared storage, but not for the root OS file system. In fact, I started...

But that doesn't allow to use HA, right?

Thanks, that works

Hello, thanks for your response. I already have the entry in the fstab, and it mounts nicely without problems: //192.168.0.110/pihole_db /media/pihole_share/ cifs rw,vers=3.0,credentials=/root/.smbcredentials 0 0 However, I don't see any option to mount that in the container. Also, this makes...

Hello. I'm looking for a way to share a read-only samba across nodes. I tried to mount it on the UI but even if I just select it as container data it tries to create subfolders within the share, which is not permitted and not what I want. I want to mount a shamba share in the cluster, that at...

I know this is kind of an old thread, but I'm in this exact same situation, with a little difference: I have a cluster of 3 nodes, where one of the nodes is already on proxmox 7. Should I just update the other two from 5 to 6 then to 7 and finally all of them to 8?

Ok, thank you for your answer, gonna try that out. Then I don't know what the purpose of the HA group is, because in my case, there were two nodes available and still it chosen the only which was not on the group.

I did that already, and the CT still ends in the wrong node. Take a look at this screenshots:

Yes, I have to get into the console of the node, and then edit the file that says where the VMs are to put it in the right place. It is `/etc/pve`

Here is an screenshot of my current cluster state and the replication tasks. As you can see, replication is only done between nodes proxmox-2 and proxmox-3, which are the ones having ZFS storage.

Hello. I have a HA cluster with three nodes. I have replication between two nodes. Each of those two nodes have a zfs pool that is used for replication. I have replication rules setup between those two for HA. I have an older third node that does not have ZFS setup, so I don't use it as a...

Yes, that is exactly like that for me. I am using 6.2. As someone said on a previous comment, that not being default it's a joke

Nobody has an idea of why this could be happening? I feel very nervous not being able to manage the old snapshots from proxmox. All I can do is make new ones on the directory that is mounted on the same samba mount that I don't have access to

Well, it is hard to say. Since then I did some things that may have impacted it: - Moved all my backups to an external location, so I don't have any snapsot on the local storage anymore - Added two more nodes to the cluster, not sure if now it is load balancing some of the data (I don't think so)

Hello. This is still a problem for me. I don't know why I can write to a subfolder on the CIFS share mounted as a folder, but I can't write to the root to backup. This is the configuration of both on /etc/pve/storage.cfg cifs: Backup path /mnt/pve/Backup server nas.home share...

Thank you all for the responses! I will keep the OS on the mechanical disk and I'll keep an eye on the wearout. Is it enough to take a look at the wearout % on the disks list? Or should I run some specific test! I will also consider an 1U server with proper 120mm fans.

Wow, thank you very much for sharing your story. Indeed it is easy to go down the rabbit hole. I thought my mechanical keyboard addiction was expensive... until I discovered home lab. Dam it, each hobby is more expensive than the previous. My main limitation is that I want to keep everything on...

Ok, this is weird. I just created a directory inside the mounted CIFS and I was able to backup to that subdirectory. I don't understand why this works and backing up directly to the mounted CIFS share does not. I will really appreciate any explanation.

I just opened my newest node, the EliteDesk 800 G1 mini to find two nice surprises: It has a M2 slot. It is limited to Sata III but that will allow me to have two disks, which is very nice. I ordered a 500GB M2 module for a total of 1TB. Of course I don't plan to put both disks on raid, because...

Not sure if that is the same as I said (enabling it on all nodes at Datacenter level). Sho it is not required that the ZFS pool is named the same? I had the impression that it is needed.