Search results

Hello @Stoiko Ivanov, thanks for your reply. DNS is exactly the same for both nodes. /etc/hosts is unmodified and shows this (example for mx01): root@mx01:~# cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost ::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback ff02::1 ip6-allnodes ff02::2...

Hello Proxmox-Forum, we do have a storage error. We are running a 2-node cluster of the latest mail gateway version in HA mode. One of the nodes started to make trouble delivering mail to external domains (Microsoft-based and others). The error is reproducible. The error message on the node1 is...

Hello, I had the same issue and the reason was that the mdraid-daemon somehow held the zfs resource busy. I had to stop the mdraid of the zfs dataset and then it was easily destroyed.

Hello @B.Otto and others listening in, I did as supposed and attached the OPNsense WAN to the vmbr0 of the Proxmox System: auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto enp41s0 iface enp41s0 inet manual iface enp41s0.4040 inet manual #Test auto vmbr0 iface vmbr0 inet manual address...

Hello @B.Otto, I followed your thoughts, but I am stuck now: auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto enp41s0 iface enp41s0 inet manual iface enp41s0.4040 inet manual #Test auto vmbr0 iface vmbr0 inet manual address 65.*.*.117/26 gateway 65.*.*.65 pointopoint 65.*.*.65...

Hello everyone, I have looked around and did not find the one solution that fits my current setup. Maybe you can help me what needs to be done to enable the additional subnet for my instance. Here is the general network layout: I would like to use the additional subnet for several servers...

Hi @Stoiko Ivanov , good spotted. We played around with the disclaimers, but there was no way of having multiple actions or having multiple rules applied for sending messages, to have an ability to split the long disclaimer.: Do you think we discovered a bug in general?

I believe it was 6.4 at that time. Please see the mail I just sent you for the source of the message that was delivered ok. Thank you and best regards, Nico

Hello @Stoiko Ivanov , thank you for your message. In fact we modified the disclaimer directly within the db as the API was not willing to accept our block and this was a key feature we wanted to have from "the old system". It was working this way fine until July 2021. After that the issues...

Hello @Stoiko Ivanov , here comes the dump: Found RULE 4 (prio: 98, in, active): Blacklist FOUND FROM GROUP 2: Blacklist OBJECT 1: nomail@fromthisdomain.com OBJECT 72: email.lead-forensics-success.co.uk OBJECT 73: email.leadforensicsmm.com FOUND ACTION GROUP 18: Block OBJECT...

Hello @Stoiko Ivanov, yes I am willing to provide you any information. Can you please direct me, how to produce the best possible output for your review? I think the tracking center view might be a bit too much away from the real action, do you agree? The dkim signature is done on PMG.

Hello, we've got 2 mailgateways in production and we are happy with them. We recently noticed that DKIM is not working if we add a disclaimer through the mail filter actions. If we switch off the disclaimer, we get a valid/ok message for DKIM. If we enable disclaimer we get the following...

Hello, we are using the quarantine solution and we stumbled across the issue that users are not able to define the language for their quarantine messages or the quarantine portal when logging in via ticket-url from the mail. Is there any solution that is update proof to have user defined...

Hello Forum, since a crash of the root disk of the virtualization host of one cluster here, we experience issues with the ceph mon service on that node: We are running the following versions: Do you have any idea how to bring back the "magic" ? ;-) Thank you and best regards, Nico

Hi @Stoiko Ivanov , thank you for your answer. We will go that direction. Best regards, Nico

Hello Forum, we recently changed our mail gateway infrastructure to PMG and we are quite happy with it. Nevertheless we do have one issue. We use HTML disclaimer we add with the action/ruleset in PMG. Is there any reliable way to have an alternative disclaimer for text only mails? How can we...

Hello @RokaKen, I fixed the issue with the following statements: unlink /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librados.so.2 && ln -s /lib/librados.so.2 /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librados.so.2 unlink /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libradosstriper.so.1 && ln -s /lib/libradosstriper.so.1...

Hello @RokaKen , so the recommendation is to wait for the next dist-upgrade to possibly fix things? Best regards, Nico

Hello @RokaKen , thank you for your message, but I did not break it at all. It was apt upgrade which I was supposed to run earlier in the threat. I guess there is something wrong with the packages since the last update of the systems. I do have another cluster we run, but I will not update it...

Downgrade did not help... root@pve1:~# apt install libpq5=11.11-0+deb10u1 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be DOWNGRADED: libpq5 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 downgraded, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded...