Search results

We've been using a traditional SAN with iscsi for over 10 years, it has been ultra reliable. Now looking at ceph and have built a 3-server ceph cluster with Dell R740xds. The device has six interfaces, three to one switch, three to another. One port is public internet One port is public ceph...

Could Proxmox clarify if the user whitelist, specifically, will skip all content/virus checks when added? We have one user who has a message with an attachment constantly being classed as a virus incorrectly. We want to whitelist the sender so this is not checked. If not, could Proxmox...

We're using the /config/ruledb/who/{ogroup}/domain api call but can create who objects but there seems to be no way to delete them. Is this an oversight? We need to be able to do this via the API in the same way they can be created.

We've tried whitelisting some addresses against the whole system which always fail spam checks but are valid. We have a WHO record created trying to match the address in each way: Reg exp: "*.@domain.com" Email: "specificemail@domain.com" Domain: "domain.com" They are set within the filter...

Is there a reason both of the above do not have an option to select the email address they were sent to as a filter? When both have a lot of messages, sometimes incorrect, trying to find that one message is often impossible. The same for exposing it via the API. Clearly the To: is known as it...

Could Proxmox give some rationale behind placing the Virus checks after Spam? If a message is being caught as a virus, it really doesn't matter what the spam checks have scored. This eats up valuable DNSBL queries for messages that will always be caught regardless of the score. It would be...

Following the upgrade guide and getting to the PgSQL part: root@mx1:~# pg_dropcluster --stop 13 main Error: specified cluster does not exist root@mx1:~# pg_upgradecluster -v 13 11 main Stopping old cluster... Restarting old cluster with restricted connections... Notice: extra pg_ctl/postgres...

Getting this error in the logs. Mar 8 22:36:10 xxx postfix/smtpd[19218]: proxy-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE: 451 4.3.0 Error: queue file write error; from=<xxxx@xxxx> to=<xxxx@xxxx> proto=ESMTP helo=<xxxxxxx> Along with Mar 8 22:36:10 xxx postfix/smtpd[19218]: warning: timeout talking to proxy...

Are there any plans for you to alter the system that mails with held attachments and viruses can be searched by email address? This information would be captured on the receiving message and would then allow us to build against the API so users can see these messages and release them if required.

We've got about 25 custom scores set via the GUI with pmg-smtp-filter reloaded via the GUI and also on the command line. Is there anyway to debug why SA is ignoring the custom scores?

As per https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/firewall-enabled-in-datacenter-prevent-bridge-vm-comunication-on-the-same-node.21372/page-2, this appears to affect many. The suggested rule change of iptables -D PVEFW-FORWARD -m conntrack --ctstate INVALID -j DROP does "resolve" this although may not...

I've been playing with PMG this afternoon and whilst I like the idea and clustered setup of the platform, i'm not too sure if this is suitable for a hosting environment (many servers, users between them). The settings appear to be fairly global with no ability to add a domain and have specific...

This isn't so much a support request but a feature improvement. Currently you can set firewall rules on the cluster/dc level, hv/node and VM. We would like to apply some rules at the highest level that filter down to VM, such as ports we want to block for all users (i.e malicious ports used...

The docs for cloud-init are a little thin on the ground being such a new feature. What is the expected behaviour for this in proxmox? Should the cloud-init drive remain always connected? if so, after the machine is shut down and then started again, it fails with the error: qemu-img: Could not...

Looking through most recent threads on resizing, I can see wiki links on how to do this via commands within the VM but nothing specific outside of the VM. We want to automate this so if an order comes in for an increase it can happen without user involvement or needing to get in to the VM...

Hi All, So we're playing with "ipfilter-net*" to specifically state what IPs a VM is allowed to use - that works fine. However, if the INPUT firewall is set to ACCEPT, it allows all traffic to any IPs and not just those in the IPset. I would say that the INPUT needs to still honour what is...

With KVM VMs at least, the IPs are on a sort of free-for-all. We could create an inbound and outbound firewall route so they can only use their assigned IPs but that is quite labour intensive and still means they can at least add an IP alias and ARP will do nasty things. Does Proxmox have any...

Last week something happened where nodes just started rebooting each other because I assume, they thought things were down so we removed all VMs from cluster. This morning, a similar thing happened. One node went down, then another and another. Initially, we thought this was due to conntrack...

We've got all our nodes online and added one server to HA but it remains in the queued status. I have attached an image showing the cluster but it just remains in the dead status. Have restarted the cluster process too without much change. Is there anything else to check?

Looking to move some internal VMs over from OnApp to Proxmox. The backup image file that OnApp appears to create is a just a file level based backup. Does anyone have any experience in getting those in to Proxmox 5 with local storage (to test). Thanks!