Search results

Given your reply, I decided to first see if this was user error, so I checked on replication for these VMs. To my surprise it was not enabled. Therefore when I was migrating them between machines, I'm guessing they had no "diff" to migrate from? Once replication was configured and allowed to...

Yes, except the result is not the full disk. Imagine replication taking the time to complete 200GB, but in the end, the result is 8GB. That what seems to be happening. I'll run this now and report back in a bit. Thanks for taking the time.

Boy, I did NOT know how to write a good title for this. Something weird is going on, or I'm losing my marbles. Two of my virtual machines have thinly provisioned ZFS volumes of 200GB each, but whenever migrating between nodes, the process takes a long time and appears to be replicating the...

As somebody's who's wished to contribute, in some small way, to an open source project this is really neat for me to be involved with. Thanks Fiona for opening the discussion. I may open a bug as well. Appreciate your time!

Anything else I can provide?

Happily readlink /sys/class/nvme/* ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:03.2/0000:06:00.0/nvme/nvme0

Sure thing, and thanks for your reply. smartctl -H -A -f brief /dev/nvme-subsys0 smartctl 7.2 2020-12-30 r5155 [x86_64-linux-5.15.39-3-pve] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-20, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org Smartctl open device: /dev/nvme-subsys0 failed: No such device

Happily. Thanks for your reply. readlink /sys/block/nvme0n1/device ../../nvme-subsys0 smartctl -H -A -f brief /dev/nvme0n1 smartctl 7.2 2020-12-30 r5155 [x86_64-linux-5.15.39-3-pve] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-20, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org === START OF SMART...

Greetings Proxmox community! I recently bought a Samsung pm1725a U.2 SSD, updated the firmware, and put it into service in my Proxmox server. It's working great, and `smartctl -a` in the console shows happy things. smartctl 7.2 2020-12-30 r5155 [x86_64-linux-5.15.39-3-pve] (local build)...

Thanks again for your time. This makes total sense.

Thank you for taking time to respond, Dylan. I have two bind mounts, each having their own owning user and group on the host. Because the function of this LXC used both mounts, I thought a single user in the LXC could be mapped to the respective IDs required on the host for access to those...

Greetings, Is it possible to map a single uid/gid in an LXC container to multiple uids/gids on the host? Surely it is, but I am apparently not smart enough to figure this one out. Host: u: 1001 g: 1001 u: 1005 g: 1006 Container: u: 1000 g: 1000 What I want: The container user and group...