Search results

The proxmox hosts are neighter connected to the internet, nor do they have an uplink to the internal network. They are just accessible via an on-demand vpn connection. Always on vpn tunnel is not allowed.

Thanks for your help. I think i will use one hosts as ntp server as you recommend.

Thanks for your replies. This is interesting. Always thought i have to use an stand-alone NTP server. NTP VM, proxying to internal ntp or global ntp seems no good idea at all.

HI, we had the same issue upgrading proxmox 5 to 6. The network interfaces have been renamed and bonding interfaces had wrong slaves configured.

Hi, we are using a 3 node Proxmox Cluster where the hosts do not have access to the internet, nor to the internal network. All hosts are managed via a dedicated VPN network. Accessing the hosts from the internal network is not possible. VMs, which provide any services to the internal network...

Has been a while, but the Problem is solved. I dissolved the bond and build an own subnet. Now it is working. Thanks for help.

I have tried this. Still no success. How does your test setup look like? corosync and PVE versions?

Okay, i think i understood the problem with the bonding. Changing the network configuration like you suggested in solution 2, leads to additional rings in the corosync.conf?

Sorry. maybe i explained bad. Ring1: Each Server has two 40G Ports, connected like you wrote. Each Server has two 40G Ports, connected like you wrote. server1 -> Server2 and server3 The adresses of the servers are 10.15.15.50, 10.15.15.51 and 10.15.15.52 Ring0: Each server is connected to an...

ring0: uses an unmanaged switch. ring1: servers are linked directly. It is always ring 1 failing. Ceph is working via ring1 without errors.

Hi, we have a 3 Nodes Cluster with 2 corosync rings, using this configuration. logging { debug: off to_syslog: yes } nodelist { node { name: proxmox-1 nodeid: 1 quorum_votes: 1 ring0_addr: 10.1.1.40 ring1_addr: 10.15.15.50 } node { name: proxmox-2 nodeid...