Search results

After the 2nd bridge, this is the status of: /etc/hosts: 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost 10.99.99.25 pmx.xxxx.corp pmx # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts ::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback fe00::0 ip6-localnet ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix ff02::1 ip6-allnodes...

Hi! We applied the configuration right now, and lost the network again. Here is the output of "ip a" obtained from console after the bridge was created: 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd...

Got it. No. All the NICs are isolated, independent.

If by "bonded" you mean "if there is a network cable connecting the NIC and the switch", yes. All of them are connected.

Hi! Thanks for replying. I can't apply the configuration right now, but I guess this would help: --- /etc/network/interfaces 2022-07-14 14:50:38.538572632 -0300 +++ /etc/network/interfaces.new 2022-07-15 17:44:22.785621860 -0300 @@ -27,3 +27,11 @@ bridge-ports eno1...

Hello! We just installed a new instance of Proxmox (7.2-7) in a server with 4 NICs, and it is completely clean. No CTs, VMs, whatever. Everything is fine, except that every time we tried to create a 2nd bridge to the another eno* NIC, through the web interface, we lost network access to the...

Hi! So it seems that something that I installed affected the container ability to install Nginx. I installed: lsb-release, vim, docker and docker-compose.

Hi! Thanks for reply. In this particular context, this webserver will work as a reverse proxy only, for an intranet site (so, no internet access). In this sense I could use Caddy for example (this idea just occurred to me now by reading your reply). But, anyway, is there a way to fix this?

Hi! After creating a privileged container with Debian 10 template image, I'm unable to install Nginx: The most relevant part of the issue is here: (...) Setting up libnginx-mod-http-image-filter (1.14.2-2+deb10u3) ... Setting up nginx-full (1.14.2-2+deb10u3) ... Setting up nginx...

It happened in my server (6.2-4) right now. Today is Dec, 29, and the server was stopped at Dec, 26 at 09:35... The only solution was a server reboot. Weird.

Hi. That's the content of my /etc/apt/sources.list: deb http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian buster main contrib deb http://ftp.br.debian.org/debian buster-updates main contrib # security updates deb http://security.debian.org buster/updates main contrib UPDATE: ok, that's the missing line: deb...

I'm running version 6.2-4. After running apt-get update and dist-upgrade, nothing happens. How can I upgrade to version 6.3? Thanks. Regards.

Hi! I'm sorry, but I don't get it... The issue with CentOS 7 is that it doesn't allow login with root into the console. So how can I access the container in order to manage it? Thanks. Regards.

Hi! How is it possible to deploy centos 7 template and login to the console? Thanks. Regards.

Hi! Thanks for the help. It seems we are fixing the problems with your suggestions. Just another issue: when we send test e-mails via command line from another system (using ssmtp), the messages seems to get the "authentication layer' that PMG provides (SPF and DKIM), and are delivered just...

Hi! Yesterday we opened a ticket at our datacenter's support and it was solved. Now the IP resolves to a host at our domain. So the new questions are: 1) What we need to do so the new messages get delivered? 2) What we need to do so the old, queued messages, be delivered? Of course the...

Hi! Thanks for reply. I configured an A entry in our DNS manager for our domain. But it seems that the configuration of the datacenter's resolution is getting precedence... The IP is 177.154.135.250. But how the datacenter could help if they does not have any relationship with our domain...

Hi! We successfully installed Proxmox Mail Gateway with SPF, DKIM and the whole shebang, and it is working fine. Sort of... For a dozen domains or so (a minority), our e-mails are getting queued, because "450 3.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find you hostname, [...] (in reply to RCPT to...

Same behaviour as before.

Ok. You are right. In my case it's a consumer board, but it behaves very well as a data NAS backup for my main server, which uses a SuperMicro board (which is a "prosumer", I supposed).