Search results

The job identifier is 3013 and the job result is failed. Jul 04 09:16:36 cl3kvm2 systemd[1]: Started ceph-mon@cl3kvm2.service - Ceph cluster monitor daemon. ░░ Subject: A start job for unit ceph-mon@cl3kvm2.service has finished successfully ░░ Defined-By: systemd ░░ Support...

Hi lo0ip Thanks for help us I upload as attach the log of journald root@cl3kvm2:/etc/ceph# cat ceph.conf [global] auth_client_required = cephx auth_cluster_required = cephx auth_service_required = cephx cluster_network = 10.10.10.65/27 fsid =...

doesn't works :( the service now don't start

Hello today one on my node crash due to a SAS controller fault. we have replace the controller but the ceph mon on this nod is "STOPPED". we have destroy and recreate it, reboot several time but nothing changes. in advance on systemctl status the mon is runnin on that node: how i can bring...

you reach it from fqdn or from IP ? if FQDN check it wich IP resolve

see here: https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Separate_Cluster_Network on: Setup on a Running Cluster

Hello we have a slow network performance. we have cluster with 6 node, HPE DL360 G10 with 2 port 40Gbit network card. connect with DAC cable to 2 cisco switch with VPC configured. and LACP on PVE 8.2.2 we use open vswitch and LACP. When we run iperf from 1 node to other one we react 30Gbit but...

Hello any one can help us to investigate on this error. also with iperf3 we get some retransmit.

Hello we have a lot of this log on our Cisco switch, our configuration is: We have 11 PVE Cluster with 6 node for cluster. each node have the same configuration: HPE DL360 G10 2 x Xeon Silver 4210 HP InfiniBand FDR/Ethernet 40Gb 2-port 544+FLR-QSFP Adapte PVE 8.2.2 with Linux Kernel 6.5.13-6...

what kind of disk do you have? we have dl360 g10 with standard controll, SSD disk and don't have this poor perf.

Hello we have upgrade proxmox to PVE 8.2.4 and set the VM with Qemu 9. we are experimenting a issues with CPU usage. Guest VM with windows (any version) become slowly and unusable, with CPU at 100% from PVE the CPU usage of that VM is 10% ... if i power off the VM and ON issues was fixed...

thanks a lot i't worked when i've try i've get error i don't know why but now works thanks a lot

Scalability: Multiple ceph-mds instances can be active, and theywill split the directory tree into subtrees (and shards of a singlebusy directory), effectively balancing the load amongst all activeservers. Combinations of standby and active etc are possible, for examplerunning 3 active...

Hello i want to use PVE with ceph for server cephFS. actually i've an old ceph cluster build as a virtual that i want to replace with PVE for managing CEPH. in previus cluster i've 3 MDS, 2 active and 1 stanby, i've a lot of connection to this cephfs. i don't find a way to add more then 1...

fio for windows? do you have a link for download? and wich command do you have used? only for do the same test. winsat disk is a good tools from windows it's very realistic that i see also in past. with fio under linux we don't have this issues.

my network was 2x 40gbit for each server. but is not network problem, because the other partition or disk with same configuration perform more then 2times ... the difference is not from 10 to 20 ... is from 200 to 1000 ... on random e from 2000 to 4000 from sequential ...

My MSA is SAS not SAN i can expose only the disk and need to be formatted from PVE. I've alredy check this possibility but i lost some functionality taht i've with ceph. shared storage, if i have shared storage i don't have snapshost, or thin provisioning, or somthing other. if i cannot do a...

bi ussyes with Linux OS UB18-22 centos, etc etc all right perf. only windows

Hi the hardware was the same. we are converting our vmware server to proxmox. the differenct was the Storage. on vmware we have a cluster with 4 node. for the storage we use MSA2040/2050 SAS, direct connect to each node of the cluster. 1 MSA per each cluster. with proxmox we cannot use the MSA...

Thanks Falk but only with proxmox? you have the same issues on your enviroment? with vmware i don't have this difference. what kind of problem? what do you thinkg about that? from my side is very strange.