Search results

Checked again today with new Windows Server 2022 STD installation (PVE up to date, args: -smbios type=11,value=x). Still the same.

Does it works with OVMF (UEFI) BIOS?? In my case manufacturer is always as "UEFI Development kit II / OVMF", whatever I do. root@dell-r650xs:~# pveversion -v proxmox-ve: 7.2-1 (running kernel: 5.15.64-1-pve) pve-manager: 7.2-11 (running version: 7.2-11/b76d3178) pve-kernel-5.15: 7.2-13...

Hello! I don't know if this is Proxmox or Mikrotik issue, but I've stuck with this for good. I'm getting VLAN ID from another location inside which are another VLANs, so we have QinQ here. All is delivered to rack cabinet, where Proxmox cluster is running. What I want to do is to strip...

Let me cite explanation of the problem here from a talk given by Mikrotik's team member: "There is a challenge there and it creates a serious throughput/performance issue when you're using this in ESXi and KVM Proxmox because of the way the buffer are arranged transfer the packets out. Hyper-V...

Hello! We know the problem with other than Linux routing platforms in efficiently on Proxmox. Some tests results are shown here: https://blog.kroy.io/2019/08/23/battle- ... l-routers/ And here the exactly reason of issue is explained (CHR casus)...

I just replied to refresh the thread only, if it does works like that. Thanks for looking here. Regards, syd

OK, I think the problem is solved! As it likes to be, it was nuance. And, what it makes me happy, it wasn't Proxmox fault. I discovered that problem with not answering for ping requests wasn't occurred on Linux based platforms. My computer on which I was testing configuration was just laptop...

Hi. Is it necessary to have bonding when we starting do VLANs? I'm asking because of this: http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Vlans I did my configuration by HTTP GUI last year - just by adding new bridge and type eth0.11 to ports, that's it. You, Udo, don't have a bonding and seems to be OK.

I have vmbr1 turned off (is not marked to autostart): vitek:~# ip link show 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 2: eth0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state DOWN qlen 1000...

Hi! If I only could see something wrong with it. You can see that ping request de facto are hit the Host1, but stay not answered by him. There is some result of tcpdump from my PVE: vitek:~# tcpdump -vvv -i eth1 host 213.216.77.122 | grep ICMP 15:31:36.941008 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 116, id 44...

Well, I did like You said, but nothing changed at all :( All tagged traffic is on one ethernet of PVE. Another is turned off. Also the same port on the switch is turned off. I don't see any changes on network and the problem still occur :( Now my config looks like that now: # network...

Thanks for answer! So, if I'm understanding well I need to turn off any not tagged packets on PVE ethernets? I left PVE's eth0 without any tag and with private IP just in case, but clean (no VLAN) community should be separated from my LAN anyway, because LAN is connected only to e2 port...

I didn't made it 2 days ago, but I wrote it today. It's HERE. If any of You can look, will be nice. Best Regards, syd

Hello all! I'm confused, because I don't know in which way should I go to look for solutions. Let me describe my problem as simple as I can. It's about network issues. This is schema: _____________________________________________________________ |...

It didn't worked like that. Maybe there were some more complicated problems, not only with DNS requests. After adding three of needed hosts it wasn't able to download packets anyway, but these hanging was different that before adding lines to /etc/hosts. Temporally I did some other network...

Yep. That exactly what I was thinking about. I have to wait for night anyway. Now I'm only wondering if will it works if on other side are virtual host on apache. Regards&thanks, syd

Hello all! I have a problem with make an Internet connection work properly on my PVE. I have correct connection to the world, but DNS requests are broken. The issue is described here but no one gives an answer with some ideas. BTW, It seems that it's a problem with Proxmox, not configuration of...

After long time, but just saw this older post, while writing on other problems. But... the upper problem still exist. I just left it and I'm logging from my LAN to VM2 not directly for its IP, but after log in to VM1 and then do "ssh <ip_of_VM2>". It's annoying, but I have no idea what's is...

Hi, I have two routers as KVMs (CentOS5) with VLANs on my PVE (v1.7). My LAN is connected to the first router by NIC eth0.11 and I want to connect PVE as a client to this gateway also. So the gateway for PVE is VM working on this PVE. The gateway on PVE is set via vmbr11. There is connection. On...

Hi! It seems that I have the same problem. My default gateway for ProxmoxVE is via eth0.11, not eth0. And gateways are running as KVMs on the same machine. But it doesn't mater, bcoz I would swear, that it was working like that on v1.6. Now I have 1.7 and want to update to v1.9 and, which is...