Search results

  1. dakralex

    [SOLVED] VM won't start with PCI passthrough after upgrade to 9.0

    Great that it works. But no, for the intel-iommu it can only take 39 or 48 bits for now (it might allow 52 at a later time when 5-level paging is supported by QEMU, but that's for quite specific use cases and one needs the hardware that supports that, but I digress). The only thing that's...
  2. dakralex

    [SOLVED] VM won't start with PCI passthrough after upgrade to 9.0

    I just sent the patch to the mailing list for review, if we go with exposing the aw-bits option then this patch will be available in a future release. For now, setting the machine version to 9.1 or lower or setting qm set <vmid> -args '-global intel-iommu.aw-bits=39' should mitigate the change...
  3. dakralex

    [SOLVED] VM won't start with PCI passthrough after upgrade to 9.0

    Just to update this thread too [0], the Intel vIOMMU's default address bit width value was increased from 39 bits to 48 bits in QEMU 9.2, so the error Failed to set vIOMMU: aw-bits 48 > host aw-bits 39 can be mitigated by pinning the machine version to 9.1 or lower, which still has the old...
  4. dakralex

    After upgrade to PVE 9, qm, ha-manager, pvestatd, and more fail to start (unknown file 'ha/rules.cfg')

    Hm, please look into whether /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ contains the Debian Trixie repositories, Proxmox VE 9 / Trixie repositories, Ceph Trixie repositories and that you run apt dist-upgrade. Other packages might be held back because Proxmox VE 9 package dependencies might not be available.
  5. dakralex

    issues while upgrade from proxmox 8.4 to 9

    Hi! Which command have you used to upgrade the packages? It is important to always use apt dist-upgrade instead of apt upgrade as described in [0], because among other things the latter will make packages stay on a lower versioned package instead of resolving the package dependencies correctly...
  6. dakralex

    Proxmox Update von 8 ->9 defekt

    Wie schaut denn die apt history aus (cat /var/log/apt/history.log - am besten als eigene Datei anhängen)? Ist Proxmox VE nach dem Ausführen der obigen Kommandos überhaupt noch am Host installiert (nach dem purge sollte eine Warnung kommen, dass man explizit eine Datei anlegen muss, um die...
  7. dakralex

    Proxmox Update von 8 ->9 defekt

    Interessant, wurde der journalctl Befehl auch mit dem root user ausgeführt (nur dieser User hat Einsicht auf die Logs dieser Services)? Andernfalls deutet das eventuell hin dass auf dieser Node weder der CRM noch LRM Service gestartet wurde... Was ist denn der Output von journalctl -xeu corosync...
  8. dakralex

    Proxmox Update von 8 ->9 defekt

    Danke, ich nehme an, dass der beschriebene Fehler bei der HLS-PVE3 Node auftritt? Wenn ja, was ist denn der Output von journalctl -xeu pve-ha-lrm und journalctl -xeu pve-ha-crm auf dieser Node? Ein Verdacht ist, dass das Lock für den LRM auf HLS-PVE3 nicht richtig freigegeben wurde.
  9. dakralex

    System log entries - apparmor and /usr/bin/man

    FYI, one rather insecure way to mitigate this is to disable the apparmor profile for now with aa-disable /usr/bin/man or another slightly better solution is to use aa-logprof (in apparmor-utils package) which allows modifying the apparmor profile with interactive suggestions, but the latter...
  10. dakralex

    System log entries - apparmor and /usr/bin/man

    Hi! Have you set up any man pager with the MANPAGER environment variable (echo $MANPAGER)? Either way, the audit message doesn't say much, but I can only guess that it could be about the seccomp(...) syscalls that man does make at startup to confine any children processes (like pagers, groff...
  11. dakralex

    Proxmox Update von 8 ->9 defekt

    Hi! Wird auf dem Cluster aktiv der HA Manager betrieben? Was ist der Zustand vom HA Manager (ha-manager status / ha-manager status --verbose)?
  12. dakralex

    kauditd0 after pve9 upgrade

    FYI, multiple (external) users reported [0] [1] [2] that processes with the name "kauditd0" were malware running on their system / containers, especially because they try to imitate a kernel thread but are clearly not a kernel thread at all. [0]...
  13. dakralex

    kauditd0 after pve9 upgrade

    And what does ls -lha /proc/$pid/exe show? If it's a kernel thread (and kauditd normally is a kernel thread), then it won't exist. But in your case it exists and should be a symbolic link to the executable that is running in that process.
  14. dakralex

    kauditd0 after pve9 upgrade

    Hi! This is just a guess, but it seems like this is a process imitating the actual kernel thread kauditd, especially because kernel threads lack information like the uptime, cpu%, mem%, etc. Could you post the output of cat /proc/$pid/cmdline and cat /proc/$pid/exe for one of these kauditd0...
  15. dakralex

    updated to PVE 9.0 then GPU passthrough stopped working on Windows

    Unfortunately, that was a false flag as the patch that introduced the bug is not in v10.0.2, but is in the upstream's staging tree. However, a quick setup with a Windows 11 VM with a 9th generation Intel UHD 630 GPU in passthrough showed similar errors, I'll look into it, but I couldn't find any...
  16. dakralex

    [Solved] PVE Web interface not working

    Hi! Assuming that JavitoVE is the Proxmox VE host, could you post the output of pveversion -v on that host?
  17. dakralex

    PVE8TO9 all ok but i have broken packages after upgrade

    Great that it worked out! The issue could've been that the node where the package upgrades failed because there wasn't any available source for these packages, i.e., there weren't any Debian Trixie repositories in the sources list. Anyway, it would be helpful to change this thread to "[SOLVED]"...
  18. dakralex

    updated to PVE 9.0 then GPU passthrough stopped working on Windows

    Thanks, so the Intel graphics driver's ctlInit fails and prints a CTL_RESULT_ERROR_NOT_INITIALIZED error (1073741825 = 0x40000001) [0], which unfortunately is quite generic and doesn't tell much about the error except that the Control API / device wasn't initialized at all. Later...
  19. dakralex

    Upgrading to Proxmox 9 Issues

    I'm not sure about what you're trying to do here: iface vmbr0 inet6 static address 2a01:4f8:10b:2119::***/127 up ip -6 route add 2a01:4f8:10b:***::/64 dev vmbr1 But you shouldn't reference other interfaces in the command then the currently referenced one. Or did you meant vmbr0 here?
  20. dakralex

    Upgrading to Proxmox 9 Issues

    Yes, plymouth is not the issue but there might be an issue while generating the initramfs, installing the kernel image, etc. So you can try to regenerate the GRUB config and check if the installation of the new kernel was successful (or try reinstalling the package) and check whether the host...