Search results

??? (which group? added where?) for testing i manually added a pv to it, but it didn't changed anything just my pv for the standard local pve vg. yepp, i successfully copied data on it for testing (and read it, afterwards) kvm1:/mnt# lsscsi -v...

hi, i'm following http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Storage_Model#Use_iSCSI_LUN_for_LVM_base to create a shared storage, but there's no value selectable for 'Base Volume'. the target (SAN-ISCSI-Chunk1) is available as /dev/sda on my cluster master. any reason that the select-box is empty...

perhaps not simpler, but more generic. i'm thinking of an automated way to exclude disks with a certain name pattern, that i'm using for caches or generated, expendable data. let's look at the following kvm-definition: name: proxy...

perhaps it's possible to implement the config-change in a hook-script that's provided by 'vzdump --script '. just a quick hint, without having tested weather any of the phases are useful for this.

if you've got physical access, you could do it the classic way: * reboot with init=/bin/bash * mount root fs rw * passwd of course, this ruins your uptime...

another way would be to setup a VPN by connecting all nodes to a server.

thanks. https://forum.proxmox.com is working fine, but can you configure the forum to use relative links only?! now when i login via SSL, the first internal link gets me back to the unencrypted version.

hey proxmox team, if you plan on releasing PVE-2.0 with kernel 2.6.32, you should check for this bug.

i don't see the advantage of posting man pages into the wiki for the average user, since everyone has an up-to-date copy. but it's a benefit for new users who want to see what's possible without installing. if man pages are posted in the wiki, they should be in sync with the current release...

private holds your openvz containers. root is for running openvz containers. i think you don't lose any memory, since it's similar to a bind-mount.

great ok, can you please add a boot-parameter similar to maxroot/maxswap in the next release?

awesome. however - all parameters i tried didn't work :-(

thanks, will try that. is there a generic way to inject some parameters for the kvm command line for testing? something in /etc/qemu-server/*.conf?

that's ok, but i'd like to file a bug against the ambiguous status. especially since the last line indicates success. additionally i'd like to file a feature request to check for incompatible software before online migration. as i remember correctly something like that is already done, if you're...

hi, i tried to use XEN (paravirtualized) inside a KVM. booting the xen kernel fails with all available KVM-kernels. it just crashes and reboots. the underlaying minimal debian is fine (without xen). while running XEN inside KVM sounds like a bit awkward, i still need it for testing. as i'm...

hi, i just did a online migration of a KVM machine from kernel 2.6.32 to 2.6.18, which failed. however the log is a bit ambiguos: /usr/bin/ssh -t -t -n -o BatchMode=yes 192.168.2.11 /usr/sbin/qmigrate --online 192.168.2.11 106 Mar 05 12:41:06 starting migration of VM 106 to host '192.168.2.11'...

that's exactly what i meant. thanks

i'm talking about backup - honestly! the message above is from the backup-mail. some more context is: 101: Mar 04 13:02:20 INFO: Starting Backup of VM 101 (qemu) 101: Mar 04 13:02:20 INFO: stopped 101: Mar 04 13:02:20 INFO: status = stopped 101: Mar 04 13:02:21 INFO: backup mode: stop 101...

hi tom, actually i'm not having problems with it. removed the cd drive, since it's only for install, anyway. i just wanted to point out, that backup has problems without the iso, because you said isos don't get backed up. why do they fail then?

dear proxmox team, can you reproduce this bug in your testbed?