Search results

Hi, (Trying to see if I can get the floppy patch from this thread http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/10910-Floppy-patch into the proper format) Trying to follow the developer build instructions at https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-common.git;a=blob_plain;f=README.dev;hb=HEAD #installed a squeeze x64...

Not much information to go on. The host is a regular Debian install, so follow iptables etc documentation.

Perhaps obvious: re UAT: 1. of course also depends on whether the specs require realistic (comparable to the prodution environment) load/stress testing. 2. will the UAT environment perhaps also be usable as a disaster recovery solution (e.g. in another location to the production environment)...

Re: [SOLVED] Windows 2000 100% CPU; ACPI, ACPI multiprocessor HAL, after registry ed Changed HAL in Windows 2000 from ACPI Multiprocessor PC to Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) pc by "upgrading" device driver software in device manager; problem seems fixed.

Re: Challenging networking problem Hi Kevin, Cheers ;) I masked them. Good luck!

I think adamb is gently trying to suggest that the filesystem corruption you had is probably caused by something like turning off the machine without telling it to shutdown first. Normally, one just shouldn't get filesystem corruption. In other words, the problem probably lies not with proxmox...

Windows 2000 KVM VM, more or less idle, but a processor on the proxmox host is always maxed out around 100% 1 CPU, 1 core assigned, ACPI enabled in Proxmox, ACPI multiprocessor HAL CPU was set to host, changing it to Pentium 3 had no effect. Have modified registry as per Microsoft KB...

Re: Challenging networking problem Strange. Have similar setup with proxmox eth0 on WAN; bridged to vmbr0=>Vyatta VM=>vmbr1 on proxmox=>bridged to eth1. Client VMs on vmbr1, works ok. Extract /etc/network/interfaces:

Perhaps it's best to just try it out, see what happens and record your experiences on the wiki. Of course, you might want to sponsor/financially support the proxmox people to add official support for glusterfs if the benefits outweigh the alternatives...

@Blaz: I suppose you want to have other parts of the cluster placed remotely, not in your LAN? Have a look at this guide: http://www.nedproductions.biz/wiki/configuring-a-proxmox-ve-2.x-cluster-running-over-an-openvpn-intranet which seems quite exhaustive and impressive.

I think Udo just said he uses it at work (professionally). If by "their work professionally, not tests" you mean "do you use Proxmox at work to run virtual production servers, not only test servers", I'm sure the answer will be yes, as well.. As for asking for impressions about load: I'm sure a...

If you're running KVM VMs, you could try to share the RAMdisk as if they were shared between physical machines: e.g. use samba or NFS or... (insert your alternative) If you're running openvz containers, that method will still work; perhaps using bind mounts has less overhead...

Same here: Vyatta router, Windows server on KVM; db, Funambol, Asterisk servers on OpenVZ. Great product, thanks a lot!

Proxmox uses KVM to virtualize. This uses CPU (hardware) functionality: the VT extensions. I wonder if those can be accessed on an already virtualized CPU. In other words: perhaps you can't have hardware:VM (PVE in virtualbox, which uses VT):guest VM. Perhaps proxmox halts because it has no VT...

Thanks for this. On the off chance there might be a problem with the packages instead of behind the keyboard: Wanted to upgrade a Debian box with the PVE 2.1 packages installed from -13 to -14. aptitude update && aptitude full-upgrade failed with dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration...

Proxmox not only supplies KVM functionality (and cluster, GUI functionality etc) but it also supplies OpenVZ (containers) functionality. So you can have "hardcore" hardware virtualisation or lightweight containers, depending on your needs, on the same server.

I think Proxmox' policy of not immediately allowing anyone on the wiki is a very good idea as it does keep content clean. Also, am quite happy about the forums and mailing list support - without even being a paying customer. I think proxmox is giving plenty to the community, including the...

Just got this working (well, lsusb and sane-find-scanner in the guest report results): Goal: passthrough a USB scanner (could also be another device) to an OpenVZ guest. Adjusted from the USB printing howto from OpenVZ: http://wiki.openvz.org/USB_Printing_in_VE as well as some posts on getting...

For router distro: have a look at Vyatta. Debian-based, thus works with virtio net drivers (don't know if the BSD ones do already - had used pfsense before but it was a bit slow). Vyatta can do routing, NAT, firewall etc, but doesn't have intrusion detection/prevention like others do.

Hi list, Based on the wiki: http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Vnc_2.0#tls_vnc_clients_for and a post from PunjabiMunda90 in the VNC Server Help Greatly Apretiated thread: ... I started experimenting. Downloaded TigerVNC 1.1.0 Windows x86/32 bit. On the Proxmox 2.1 web page for the VM, clicked...