Search results

Storage is not only resource involved. IIRC 64 bit programs take up more memory because they use 64 bit registers instead of 32 bit ones for their variables. And as for "fit as many VEs on a server as possible.": depends on what you mean by possible. I'm sure Chris meant "possible in the sense...

AFAIU, you just need to make sure the container has enough resources (isn't squeezed by other processes, has enough memory etc). If not, I'd suggest you look in openvz or asterisk sites/resources, as this is not proxmox specific and probably too niche... I'm running asterisk on a kvm instance...

Nice, thanks a lot for posting this!

You may also be able to just convert the disk image(s), either using Virtualbox tools or qemu (see the VMWare section on the wiki)

Would have been nice if you posted what you did to fix it...

And SME server is yet another alternative: http://wiki.contribs.org/SME_Server:About ... or install samba on your proxmox box if you want to (and *know what you are doing*) ... though looking at your question, I would also suggest you just buy a NAS...

@snowman: thanks. Tried running make as root (in the normal user's directory). Still test failures. Increased VM memory from 512 to 2048 and retried. Same problem. I guess I'll just wait for the Proxmox team to upgrade libqb ;)

@mac: you recommend E1000 NICs - have you had problems with virtio NICs? No I wouldn't think so ;) The points mentioned in that link are very valid (clock sync etc) but fairly obvious to people who know virtualisation and AD (not claiming I'm one though). Perhaps that IT provider lacks some...

I suppose the obvious problem is if you virtualize all DCs for one AD on the same physical server without failover=>single point of failure. I also suspect there are many people running virtualized DCs; IIRC, MS even encourages that in their newest Windows 2012 servers.... so I'd love to see...

I would also look into optimization of IO related tasks (i.e. MySQL db access) before trying to optimize the kernel. E.g. having multiple VMs accessing a single disk as each tries to access a database seems like a much bigger target for optimization... Likewise for mysql db type, memory caching...

Agreed with Java applets often being frowned upon from a security perspective due to frequent security issues with Java and live exploitation on web sites. The problem is that there are now 2 easy alternatives for console access in Proxmox: 1. Java applet. As said, not everybody has Java...

Unfortunately not: # as root cd ~ git clone git://git.proxmox.com/git/libqb.git # no need for the rest right now # #install sources using make dinstall cd ~/libqb make dinstall ... make check-TESTS make[5]: Entering directory `/root/libqb/libqb-0.10.1/tests' make[6]: Entering directory...

Strange! Just tried again with a clean squeeze x64 vm. Did this: adduser proxmoxuser aptitude update aptitude safe-upgrade #followed #https://git.proxmox.com/?p=pve-common.git;a=blob_plain;f=README.dev;hb=HEAD apt-get -y install build-essential git-core debhelper autotools-dev \ doxygen...

Guess I'll just give up...

Bump. Any suggestions? Did a git pull in ~/libqb but no updates... Thanks.

AFAIU there are no KVM OS templates supplied with Proxmox; there was a recent thread about this.

No, I think you're right: passthrough would be the correct term; I just didn't find that wiki page. The fact that the dongle works makes it a bit more depressing - as you now have proven the passthrough mechanism in general works for your setup... so the problem lies with the ISDN adapter. No...

Only 1 way to find out. What other answer would you expect...

How exactly have you performed the pass through? A quick look through the proxmox wiki shows no info on passing through USB devices to KVM... No idea on what to do exactly except go through the event log (eventvwr.msc) on the Windows side and /var/log/syslog etc on the Proxmox side.

Error log of the last run: