Search results

Thats sad, then i have to dig further for the issue :-)

@t.lamprecht Can you maybe include this fix in the 6.14 Kernel: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/commit/?id=bc0b828ef6e5 i Stumbled on one Server against this, with an I219-LM that i passthrough to opnsense (Its a hetzner Server). Its only an issue on Kernel 6.14...

This Thread is a bit old, but i found out that the Issue with Hetzner Storage Box is not Proxmox or any Samba Versions.... Its Hetzner's Firewall! I have at home luckilly 2 Internet Providers, Cable (Vodafone) and DSL (Telekom). Over Telekom, i can access the Hetzner Box straight from the...

Maybe this helps, i tried on all my AMD Servers. Since others confirmed only AMD is affected, i didn't tested Intel Servers, but i can (have a lot of them) Tested: W11 26100.4351 and W11 26200.5651 Ryzen 7 5800X -> Crash Ryzen 9 9955HX -> Crash EPYC 9374F -> Crash Ryzen 7 PRO 8700GE -> Crash...

Thanks, this was indeed my issue :-( args: -cpu 'host,arch_capabilities=off' fixed it!

EDIT: Duplicate Thread! Correct Thread: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/amd-bsod-unsupported-processor-since-windows-build-26100-4202-update-kb5060842-its-preview-kb5058499.166828/page-3#post-779003 ------ I have a new Server, (14 servers in total now). Its the Minisforum MS-A2 with the...

1. AMD EPYC 9374F -> 6.14.5-1-bpo12-pve -> No Issues 2. AMD EPYC 9374F -> 6.14.5-1-bpo12-pve -> No Issues 3. AMD Ryzen 7 5800X -> 6.14.4-1-pve -> No Issues (But IOMMU Groups changed numbers, had to adjust) 4. Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-1315U -> 6.14.4-1-pve -> No Issues 5. Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-1115G4...

You cant place dual controllers in 2 separate buildings. Blades have at least a separate mainboard, separate memory and separate CPUs, compared to 2 controllers in the same node. I hung up for the mechanical Layout, because thats how HA is handled in Companies. TrueNas Enterprise is probably...

We buyed JovianDSS before 2022 and compared against TrueNas. At that time there was definitive no true HA on TrueNas. If things were different at that time, we would have gone TrueNas 100%. Especially because its surely cheaper. And Dual controllers is not HA for me. Ha is for me at least...

maybe i missed something, but what is 9.2+pve1 ?

Just readed, they talk about resilient replication, so i think its still the same periodically and simple zfs-send/receive. Even if its made every 5 seconds, its not the same. On JovianDSS (zfs) and Synology (btrfs) every blockchange gets instantly synced over a dedicated interface to the other...

I know, we were in a decision some years ago. We wanted an zfs over iscsi solution that was able to run in HA. At that time we used Synology HA with iscsi for the esxi servers and needed to replace that, because Synology iscsi had some issues. In the end we took JovianDSS, because it was the...

And Synology is not garbage at all, you probably aware only about the home stuff. There are RS Servers, which run in proper high-availibilty and has xeons with ecc memory. Additionally to that, there is no other solution that im aware of, that features as fine grained Samba User & Group...

1. 12-15 Proxmox Servers alone. 2. There is no word about metadata off, i tested with metadata all and metadata only. 3. Block size on disks is 4kb native, on 7450/7500/cm7-r you can reformat the disks to different blocksizes either. 4. Others didnt pointed out anything, just were lazy to read...

BTRFS is used on Synology for a decade as default Filesystem. And im running 12x Kioxia CM7-R in BTRFS Raid-10 + 8x Micron 7450 Max in BTRFS Raid 10 a little over a Month now. No issues so far. But its true that BTRFS was in the past a little experimental, however i think thats not an issue...

You are simply a noob, read first the GitHub issue to the end. Btrfs is comparable to zfs in Performance on hdds, maybe on normal consumer ssds. But im talking about 20gbs write speed and 40gbs read speeds and about millions of iops. As long you dont have the Hardware to compare, stop telling...

Depends on the drives, in my case with 8x Micron 7450/7500 Max Drives in a Raid10, i switched from ZFS to Btrfs. Btrfs is especially on mysql Databases 5-10x as fast as ZFS. And in almost every other situation Btrfs is at least 2x faster. I filed for that an issue on ZFS...

I hoped either to get finally rid from NFS, but after reading this, virtiofs seems to be senseless :-(

Yeah test repos :-)

I seen that 6.14 is available xD How dangerous is it @Thomas Lamprecht Should i wait for zfs 2.3 before upgrading and testing? :-)