Search results

Hello Martin, It works! Thanks a bunch! Before downgrade ************************************************************************* virt1:/tmp# qm start 107 kvm: usb_create: no bus specified, using "usb.0" for "usb-host" husb: open device 3.2 husb: grabbed usb device 3.2...

I can't use usb_add host:0529:0001 after this upgrade. This command crashes kvm machine with linux. I've tried: - using linux 32 instead of 64 - using last updated linux with latest kernels - disabling KVM (it was the last chance) - replacing virtio by ide Nothing helped. Bios is okay, grub is...

Updated: http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Windows_2003_guest_best_practices#Power_settings

Updated!

It sounds very-very good! Thank you guys for your great job! I'm happy to recommend Proxmox to all of my IT friends!

Just try to boot with, for example, the last Ubuntu LiveCD 10.10 and check performance.

Is there something unusual in dmesg, /var/log/messages or /var/log/syslog? Are you able to boot from livecd on this hardware and check performance?

Have you already checked your raid status?

What type of hard drives are you using?

I made a lot of tricks to boot my Windows systems (which are using virtio block device) after upgrading to proxmox-pve 1.7. Just only one of them managed to boot with cache=none, some of them I managed to boot with changing just only boot device to IDE and used another device to upgrade virtio...

Oh, thanks!

I'd try to explain using screen-shots: 1. Machine has two disks: 2. I removed first one 3. I was going to remove second one but I was wrong and removed the same again instead of another one (there was no any messages like: "this action will totally remove virtual disk from the server, are...

Yes, you this is so, but. just imagine: I have two drives on VM. I just removed one of them and is going to remove another one. But unexpectedly I removed not another one but previous one again and it was totally removed from the physical host without any confirmation. Stas

Does anyone care?

I've tried. That is why I'm asking :)

Okay. Lets the kernel support all necessary drivers for the current hardware, kvm and lvm. Is it enough to run PVE?

Can I use not pve-patched kernel for starting pve environment? Not for production but for home-using/testing. Can it be running?

What the differences between Debian kernel and pve kernel? Just drivers or something else? Can I use, for example, Archlinux for running PVE?

It works as expected! Thank you!

I'll check it soon. I think it's better to use 'K' instead of 'k' because of misunderstanding possibility. from man dd: BLOCKS and BYTES may be followed by the following multiplicative suffixes: c =1, w =2, b =512, kB =1000, K =1024, MB =1000*1000, M =1024*1024, xM =M GB =1000*1000*1000, G...