Search results

  1. S

    Last PVE 3.3 update and Xymon

    Hi Dietmar! Thanks for the fast answer. I found that my old Xymon server was not supporting TLSv1. I upgraded the server to Wheezy and Xymon 4.3.0~beta2.dfsg-9.1 and now all is fine. Thanks. Stephane
  2. S

    Last PVE 3.3 update and Xymon

    Hello, I upgraded one of my PVE 3.3 node to last packages and Xymon monitoring stopped to works for https for this node with the following error: red Sun Nov 2 11:24:43 2014: SSL error &red https://thePVEnode:8006/ - SSL error Seconds: 0.002961 The Xymon server is working on a Debian...
  3. S

    pvecm delnode not removing node from list

    Hello! I tried to remove a crashed node from a 3 nodes PVE 3.2 PVE cluster. I used the command: pvecm delnode vs-03 "pvecm nodes" no longer show the node but it still be show on the GUI list. How to remove it completely? Thank for your help.
  4. S

    CT using 2 IP going to different network (venet routing problem)

    Hello! The double gateway CT is finaly working. Thanks to multiple gateway routing. Below is the final version. Working fine. Some trouble with some route with ping but core is working. auto vmbr0 iface vmbr0 inet static address 62.xxx.212.17 netmask 255.255.255.0...
  5. S

    CT using 2 IP going to different network (venet routing problem)

    Hello! In fact I solved part of the problem adding theses ip route to vmbr1. # Edit /etc/iproute2/rt_tables and add table t99 post-up ip rule add from 195.yyy.139.99 table t99 post-up ip route add default dev vmbr1 via 195.yyy.139.126 table t99 post-up ip route...
  6. S

    CT using 2 IP going to different network (venet routing problem)

    Hello! I've a setup a config using multiple gateway as in this web page. All is working fine on the PVE node. http://generationip.com/documentation/network-documentation/93-howto-setup-multiple-default-gateway-on-linux On top of this, I mounted a CT with 2 IPs (with venet). One on the left...
  7. S

    Version different between 2 nodes (licensed and open source).

    Sorry, the problem is over. Now it's working. The node see the new packages now. I've not changed anything. root@aweb-vs007:~# pveversion -v proxmox-ve-2.6.32: 3.1-114 (running kernel: 2.6.32-26-pve) pve-manager: 3.1-21 (running version: 3.1-21/93bf03d4) pve-kernel-2.6.32-26-pve: 2.6.32-114...
  8. S

    Version different between 2 nodes (licensed and open source).

    Hi! Already did but no effect with 3.1. /etc/apt/sources.list deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian wheezy main contrib # PVE pve-no-subscription repository provided by proxmox.com, NOT recommended for production use deb http://download.proxmox.com/debian wheezy pve-no-subscription # security...
  9. S

    Version different between 2 nodes (licensed and open source).

    Hello! I'll like to understand the mistake. I've a 2 socket server with an active license and the last apt-get dist-upgrade goes the node to 3.1. Another testing server, only have the open source apt setup. This node don't want to go to 3.1. Kernel, is –114 on the licensed node. Only –109 on...
  10. S

    2 nodes 2.x production cluster: how to test 3.1 on one node?

    If you have servers with remote console access. It will be may be better to install 3.1 from scratch than upgrade. Faster and more reliable.
  11. S

    Mixed 2.3 and 3.1 cluster

    Thanks for this clear answer. Will stay away from mixing.
  12. S

    Mixed 2.3 and 3.1 cluster

    Hello! Sorry, this is a basic question. But, I prefer to be sure. Can I add a 3.1 node to an existing PVE 2.3-13 cluster? Thanks in advance,
  13. S

    [CRITICAL] Huge IO load causes freezing during backups

    Hello folks! Back from my vacations today. Does this bug finally solved?
  14. S

    Proxmox VE 3.1 released!

    How to test Promox VE 3.1 "stable" version without support fee ? Your new system of support key and fee to have access to the stable repository is a problem for test environment before putting things in production. We agree to pay for production environment but not for test servers. Same...
  15. S

    vzdump using lvm snapshot - kills the box

    Here with Dell R420 and HP DL360G6 and G7, the crash only occur on node with large openvz CT. If the CT contains 10 of thousand of files and folder, (as jpg or cache files), the backup kill the box. I've a R420 with 7 regular CT (small web servers), no crash. I have another R420 with only 2 big...
  16. S

    vzdump using lvm snapshot - kills the box

    ext3. Regular pve3 install. I still have crash with -107 kernel unfortunately. Was crashing all 3 to 5 days with -100 kernel, and each time with -107.
  17. S

    vzdump using lvm snapshot - kills the box

    Hello more on this. May be a way to look. I have 2 Dell R420 servers with the same config. The first one contains 3 larges openvz CT and was crashing. I removed the night backup script, no more crash. The 3 CT contains 10 of thousand of file (small jpg and text cache files). I have a second...
  18. S

    General crash during snaphot backup of CTs

    Hello! The server crashed again this night. Au secours !!!
  19. S

    vzdump using lvm snapshot - kills the box

    Hello! Here with a Dell R420 + PERC H710 Mini and last -107 kernel uploaded yesterday, the server crashed again this night. The server contains 3 openvz CT.
  20. S

    General crash during snaphot backup of CTs

    Thanks for the nice "soon". I upgraded the 3 servers this morning. Need to wait and see now...