Search results

I have the LSI SAS2308... hopefully there is a solution for this card? *pray* Do you mean IT-Mode flash? Thank you!

Hm... what does "no longer have the rom" mean? Where can i find the right rom and how do i flash it (probably there is a manual for that)?

Some news on this? I get the same: "Unable to load LSI Corporation MPT BIOS MPT BIOS Fault 02h encountered at adapter PCI(00h,04h,00h) Firmware Fault Code: 2667h" What can i do to solve this problem? Board is: X10SL7 from Supermirco There are some information in this thread...

Nobody? :(

Hi, if i passthrough a graphic card to a VM and shut down the VM, will the graphic card shut down too (=no power consumption)? Thanks in advance

Re: Proxmox 3.1: Are the NICs Intel i217LM and i210-AT supported by now (Intel Haswel I got it!! The solution is here: http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/9626-no-eth0-anymore-we-moved-proxmox-to-a-new-VM-(WMware-ESXi) THANK YOU VERY MUCH!

Re: Proxmox 3.1: Are the NICs Intel i217LM and i210-AT supported by now (Intel Haswel Hi, here is the screen: So there is no eth0 :/

Re: Proxmox 3.1: Are the NICs Intel i217LM and i210-AT supported by now (Intel Haswel i enabled and disabled it again... Now there is no "bond0" anymore, now it shows "both". But nothing changes It seems that the BMC settings are the master and i don't have a chance to change it via...

Re: Proxmox 3.1: Are the NICs Intel i217LM and i210-AT supported by now (Intel Haswel I dont think it's the router. I now plugged two cables in: one in IPMI one in LAN1 Now i have 3(!) reachable IPs via Ping and over two IPs i can reach the webinterface of the IPMI... What is going on here...

Re: Proxmox 3.1: Are the NICs Intel i217LM and i210-AT supported by now (Intel Haswel I tried, but same problem. Is the IPMI NIC linked to eth0? Because on the Webinterface of the IPMI it shows me the IP of the IPMI Interface for eth0 which i configured in the BIOS. Maybe this is the problem...

Re: Proxmox 3.1: Are the NICs Intel i217LM and i210-AT supported by now (Intel Haswel Hi, thanks for your quick reply! I configured my network card on the old board manually and it worked without problems. I have to following config (i wanna use only eth0 for the first): auto lo iface lo...

Re: Proxmox 3.1: Are the NICs Intel i217LM and i210-AT supported by now (Intel Haswel Hi ckx3009, thanks for your reply! I got the new MB today and i just replaced it with my old one.... Well, proxmox is booting without any problems (except CPU is not supported, but it doesn't matter). My...

great!

hey, just a short question... are there I210 Intel Gigabit NIC drivers included in this kernel? Thanks!

Re: Proxmox 3.1: Are the NICs Intel i217LM and i210-AT supported by now (Intel Haswel I bought (its still in the USA and i have to wait 2 more weeks :()the incredible new C2750D4i Asrock Motherboard (with new ATOM-CPU). This Board has i210 Gigabit Ethernet too... Will it work without issues...

thank you! it is enough to create this file with nano and set chmod? i wish you a lot of presents for christmas eve... ;)

Hell yeah, you are a god, man! your settings are gold! Look: CPU BOGOMIPS: 10376.82 REGEX/SECOND: 1236288 HD SIZE: 19.69 GB (/dev/mapper/pve-root) BUFFERED READS: 391.81 MB/sec AVERAGE SEEK TIME: 0.07 ms FSYNCS/SECOND: 4425.14 DNS EXT: 137.01 ms DNS INT...

Well, for now i can say that the Samsung SSD is the problem. I've tried a 60GB Kingston SSDNOW (with a standard ext3 proxmox installation) and i have 3935 fsyncs per second on the same port! I can't believe that the Samsung is so bad?!? I thought it is the best SSD on the market?

So guys... i made a fresh installation with only one SSD (the Samsung 128GB 840 Pro). After the installation i did the pveperf test: CPU BOGOMIPS: 10376.72 REGEX/SECOND: 1216541 HD SIZE: 19.69 GB (/dev/mapper/pve-root) BUFFERED READS: 393.92 MB/sec AVERAGE SEEK TIME...

yeah thats maybe an option, BUT the performance of the Samsung SSD is not even better with the fsync/second values?