Search results

  1. R

    Troubles with latest virtio drivers for Windows and latest PVE 1.8

    On very high load (stress test), I always make Virtio crash under Win2003 (with any kernel, 2.6.32 / 2.6.35 / 2.6.38) So the only working conf very very high load is Intel e1000 for me.
  2. R

    New Proxmox VE kernels 2.6.18, 2.6.32 and 2.6.35 released to stable

    Thanks for the response, I will wait a few year and ask again ;) About virtio, It always crash with intensive network usage, and I tested it with 1.6 and 2.0 dll, over those 3 kernels branch. (2.6.32 / .35 / .38) Crash = no more network packet.
  3. R

    New Proxmox VE kernels 2.6.18, 2.6.32 and 2.6.35 released to stable

    Hello ! Do you have any plan to include 2.6.38 kernel to pvetest repo ? I have deeply tested pure kvm performance on 2.6.32, 2.6.35 and 2.6.38, and the cpu usage for the same task is just better :) nic:e1000 kernel:2.6.32 --- WinCPU:90% ProxCPU:100% nic:e1000 kernel:2.6.35 --- WinCPU:30%...
  4. R

    Troubles with latest virtio drivers for Windows and latest PVE 1.8

    Hey Tom, the virtio link is still available in the Quote of post #18, please clean :)
  5. R

    Troubles with latest virtio drivers for Windows and latest PVE 1.8

    Really ? Well no problem I removed the link from my post. However I have no control over the dl.free.fr fileserver, so you should remove the link from your post too :)
  6. R

    Troubles with latest virtio drivers for Windows and latest PVE 1.8

    You are correct :) http://packages.debian.org/fr/squeeze/firmware-linux-nonfree are only for Broadcom BCM570* (tg3)
  7. R

    Troubles with latest virtio drivers for Windows and latest PVE 1.8

    you can fix the firmware error with this debian package here are virtio 1.2.0, please test them under official proxmox 2.6.32 / 2.6.35 and tell us.
  8. R

    Troubles with latest virtio drivers for Windows and latest PVE 1.8

    Hello Ashes, Could you confirm you always have the problem with 2.6.35 ?
  9. R

    After update to 2.6.32-2-pve, load average increase from 0 to 2

    It's a good news to see the Load Average decrease with pve-kernel-2.6.32-3-pve, because even if it's a artificial mesurement, the jump was so huge between 32-1 and 32-2 that it was scary :p
  10. R

    New KVM 0.12.5 and vzctl, vzdump, dab, ... pvetest repository!

    I'm sorry to tell you that Load Average is worst than last official 2.6.32-2 (witch was already very bad compared to 2.6.32-1)
  11. R

    After update to 2.6.32-2-pve, load average increase from 0 to 2

    If you had installed the 2.6.32-1 before, the install packages should still be on your server. So, just execute the following commands: then vim /boot/grub/menu.lst and remove the 2.6.32-2 bloc at the bottom be sure to keep the kernel 2.6.32-1-pve bloc, or your server will not reboot :)
  12. R

    New Proxmox VE Kernels 2.6.24 and 2.6.32, including KVM 0.12.4 and gPXE

    This 2.6.32-2 kernel version made my Load Average grow up from 0.2 to 0.8. I tested it on different hardware, same behaviour. I rolled back to 2.6.32-1, no more load problem. http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/4030-After-update-to-2.6.32-2-pve-load-average-increase-from-0-to-2
  13. R

    After update to 2.6.32-2-pve, load average increase from 0 to 2

    Okay, after testing, I confirm that there is a bug in the pve-kernel-2.6.32-2-pve. (at least on my hardware - Dell Optiplex 380 SF - Core2Duo 8400 - 4GB) Rolling back to pve-kernel-2.6.32-1-pve or pve-kernel-2.6.18-2-pve fix the KVM load average problem.
  14. R

    CPU Utilisation 2.6.18 vs 2.6.24

    I got the same problem than you. http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/4030-After-update-to-2.6.32-2-pve-load-average-increase-from-0-to-2 Latest 2.6.32-2 kernel update made my load average grow from 0 to 2.0 :( Previous release of proxmox (1.5 - february 2010 - 2.6.32-1 kernel) did not have this...
  15. R

    After update to 2.6.32-2-pve, load average increase from 0 to 2

    Hello, I just updated my proxmox farm from 2.6.32-1 to 2.6.32-2 kernel (with all package available in deb http://download.proxmox.com/debian lenny pve). All was okay except my cpu load average is now between 2 and 3, instead of 0 :confused: The VM image have not changed, so it's not their...
  16. R

    Setting MTU 9000 via web interface

    I also would like to be able to setup the MTU of KVM network card (vmtab101i0). For example, my Internet box force me to setup the MTU with 1492 value :p best regards,
  17. R

    Proxmox Virtual server work very slow

    I just see you have one Dell server ! You can install and use Openmanage to change this bios setting. (see screenshot)