Search results

"It is estimated that motor vehicle collisions caused the deaths of around 60 million people during the 20th century,[6] around the same as the number of World War II casualties. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemiology_of_motor_vehicle_collisions. " Your comparison is inappropriate and...

Fud is saying that there is no problem with ZFS licence on Linux You are right and you are wrong. There are 3 cases: 1. The licence incompatibility comes with linux distributions: EG: Linux distribution Canonical, Ltd. announced their plans to commercially distribute, in Ubuntu 16.04, a...

Thanks for the useful links, but I couldn't help but notice the "d" suffix, all over the post, sounds like solid numerology arguments! The list could go on container -> containerd ...

Most relevant Josef Bacik (ex btrfs maintainer at Red Hat) opinion about this step: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14907771 So is rather the limitations of the RedHat releasing pattern, they don't keep up with BTRFS. This story reminds me of...

It’s true that Cow filesystem are the best solution for data integrity. Btrfs with nodatacow is like journaling filesystem xfs, ext4 ( only for database, you could have a different mount for other files with cow), except you still have snapshots and send/receive remote incremental. This is...

The btrfs prototype for LXC doesn't use raw files, see https://www.mail-archive.com/pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com/msg18747.html Use subvolumes with btrfs storage Nodatacow is a trade-off, between performance and checksumming features of Cow. Of course is your choice. Performance gain is usually <...

Proxmox doesn't use LXD, it has his own implementation of LXC ( with pct command line). IMHO, BTRFS subvolumes with default proxmox implementation mount points are the best option ( I don't see why other mount could be faster). Beware to use a different btrfs filesystem for postgres, mounted...

Why use Synology, when we have Proxmox VE storage replication framework ? At the moment supports only ZFS https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Storage_Replication#_supported_storage_types, but this is a general framework. Since BTRFS has the snapshotting / remote send-receive incremental capabilities...

Thanks for confirmation, that the solution is further fine tuning inside of the LXC container, for lower cpu consumption. The values reported here, are at least 30 mins after the initial heavy loading of starting all the containers.

Follow up https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-ve-5-0-released.35451/#post-173777, I am playing with https://www.hetzner.com/dedicated-rootserver/ax60-ssd AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Octa-Core So far, the system is stable ( see http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1707108-TR-HETZNERRY96) I have...

This is a very good setup. On top of it, the hosting provider must have a good DDOS protection, otherwise, despite the firewall mitigation rules, a flood could block the public network, the cluster nodes fail to communicate and trigger false positive reboots.

LXC Debian Stretch landed in http://download.proxmox.com/images/system/debian-9.0-standard_9.0-2_amd64.tar.gz ... Great.

Quoting from https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Storage_Replication : Storage replication brings redundancy for guests using local storage and reduces migration time. It replicates guest volumes to another node so that all data is available without using shared storage. Replication uses snapshots to...

So soon after stretch release… it surpassed my expectations! https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-ve-5-0-beta2-released.34853/page-3#post-172535. Among the new goodies, I enjoy Storage Replication. Since there is a table there...

Sorry for the off topic.. @ Alessandro 123 strikes again ( I've been hit by in https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/proxmox-ve-5-0-beta1-released.33731/page-2#post-165830) :) P.S. A piece of advice... let him have the final word, otherwise you got infinite loop!

fstrim inside unprivileged container fails with FITRIM ioctl failed: Operation not permitted Tested on Ubuntu Xenial and Debian Jessie. See bug report https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1589289

Of course, everybody wants it asap ... The proxmox team is working really hard https://git.proxmox.com/?o=age . So, let's follow Debian's philosophy https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseWhenReady

5.0 will ship with LXC stretch template http://download.proxmox.com/images/system/ ? Can't wait for a valid systemd, out of the box, in Debian LXC https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/debian-8-6-lxc-template-with-systemd-feature-request.30212/

I noticed that you signed up with Proxmox forum recently ( one month and a half) and you already have plenty of activity on forum. This reminds me of the enthusiasm, when I have discovered this beautiful piece of software, last autumn :). I am not a veteran, but please allow me to gently remind...

For the moment, this is a low priority task . I'll update, when it gets back on the radar.