Search results

Building blocks: want to do X? You learn the base building blocks to reach X. Your tutorial system can do this, and it would help address the "gotchas", as a user will cover it on the way to the destination. Lots of things work well with a good foundation, which, in all honesty, is what a new...

Have you tried testing the memory of the PC? [Bottom option] Just to rule it out :)

Would the optional series 6.2 kernel help? https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/opt-in-linux-6-2-kernel-for-proxmox-ve-7-x-available.124189/

Let's get you started: https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/tainted-kernels.html Read carefully, and go through those dmesg logs, it'll at least give you some clues.

TBH, sometimes wading through the manual can be very intimidating for people. Having a quick guide, especially with "do this for this only thing you want to do" can be very helpful; not everyone wants to do more than the basics. Ironically, I suspect that a reasonable amount of users would...

Have you also tried changing the adaptor types?

I'm not sure at this time, I only recently enabled the feature last week when I spotted it in one of the Lawrence Systems review videos, and someone talked about it in the comments. As far as I know, it's recent and will probably stay around. The tags themselves are user-defined after all...

Datacenter->Options->Tag Style Override->[edit]->Tree Shape->Full Bit terse, but it'll get you there.

I know this will sound really silly, and it is a shot in the dark, but try running your RAM at a clock speed of about 2400Mhz [it's not too much of a step down], and see what happens. Given it is a host lockup, it would be interesting to see if that helps and it wouldn't hurt to try.

That's actually going to be a bit outside my experience here, while I do run medium-advanced Proxmox setups, they tend to be with supported hardware out of the box. What I can tell you, is that the interfaces gain support with newer Kernel versions, depending on the chipset support for the...

I fully believe you, this is not unusual ;) what has changed, tho, is the interface settings were changed to one of the physical interfaces on the machine. My thought is, when you added the card, all the interface names changed as well. So, your original interface settings no-longer pointed at...

Windows tends to firewall off the ICMP responses from ping, but the main thing is that both boxes see one another, and ping is working. Try in a browser on your PC/workstation going to https://192.168.1.42:8006

AHHH.... well, both boxes should be in the same range, and able to ping one another. On the proxmox host, try a ping to 192.168.1.7 On the windows PC, try a ping to 192.168.1.42. Using ping in windows: https://www.pagerduty.com/resources/learn/ping-network-testing-connectivity/

Okay, what we probably need to do is to establish what your router is doing. Normally, for a windows machine, it'll get addresses automatically. So, as part of that, you can find out the IP of the router, and also the netmask [this is simpler than it sounds, but tends to be made complicated a...

Okay, try making the following changes in the interfaces file, save it, and reboot: Change: iface enp4s0 To: iface enp4s0f0 Change: bridge-ports enp4s0 To: bridge-ports enp4s0f0

I'll pass some additional tutorials to you here, as you are in the deep end, and I'm not 100% sure what you already know: nano is a nice text editor, and will help you to edit the interfaces file: https://linuxize.com/post/how-to-use-nano-text-editor/ Debian provides an overview of configuring...

It is a fair warning, though, I understand if you don't want to take the leap to buying a subscription. Again, really depends on a person's use-case. Where it shines, though, is when you want the fully-tested packages for a system where things must not go wrong. And, if you don't mind that...

Yes, the write amplification from TrueNAS can slow things down majorly. I've been wrestling with a system on my end, but I have been aiming for data safety instead of speed, which ends up at the opposite end of what you are trying to achieve. I certainly got the data safety... As a suggestion...

In the performance tab, there will be a section showing if there is cached data from the disk. Now, it has to go somewhere ;) The idea is your processes might be taking up 25% of RAM, but where is that cached data being stored? In RAM. So, do some quick addition and see if that is what is...

For others who come along later they'll find the following information useful, if you provide it: The hardware layout for the virtual machine (you can screenshot this) The disks layout for the node (you can screenshot this) The storage layout for the datacentre (you can screenshot this)...