Search results

#FacePalm Thank you bud, You've been a star!!!

Ok i'm a bit lost still with how to resolve it?

The ln /etc/motd /etc/motd.tst was successfull. * `lsattr /etc/passwd` returned ----i-------------- /etc/passwd I'm not sure what else I can check?

I'm telling you! D: root@c5:~# ls -ld /etc drwxr-xr-x 92 root root 190 Aug 18 15:17 /etc -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1661 Aug 18 15:17 /etc/passwd- root@c5:~# diff -s /etc/passwd /etc/passwd- Files /etc/passwd and /etc/passwd- are identical root@c5:~# ln /etc/passwd /etc/passwd.tst ln: failed to...

Sorry could not paste the entire output in 1 message... fcntl(3, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_WRLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=0, l_len=0}) = 0 alarm(0) = 15 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0 rt_sigaction(SIGALRM, {sa_handler=SIG_DFL, sa_mask=[]...

Just seeing the write error... sroot@c5:~# strace vipw execve("/usr/sbin/vipw", ["vipw"], 0x7ffce0950250 /* 18 vars */) = 0 brk(NULL) = 0x55d52b8e2000 access("/etc/ld.so.preload", R_OK) = 0 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/etc/ld.so.preload", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3...

Ok so the zpool is stable again. But the file remains readonly for me.. So I'm unsure what is the cause? The touch worked, and the ls /etc/*pass* only shows 2 files. I've removed the passwd- one but it keeps coming back. root@c5:~# ls /etc/*pass* /etc/passwd /etc/passwd-

Looks like it might be the zpool... So 3 questions... 1: Why do we not get notifications about the degraded state for zpool? 2: How can I determine which drive has failed? It's not showing the drive name or serial number? 3: Would this then in fact stop me from editing the pass file and...

Yes I am logged in as root -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1661 Aug 18 12:17 /etc/passwd root@c5:~# mount sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime) proc on /proc type proc (rw,relatime) udev on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,nosuid,relatime,size=65957520k,nr_inodes=16489380,mode=755) devpts...

This did also not work... root@c5:~# vipw Select an editor. To change later, run 'select-editor'. 1. /bin/nano <---- easiest 2. /usr/bin/vim.tiny Choose 1-2 [1]: 1 vipw: can't restore /etc/passwd: Operation not permitted (your changes are in /etc/passwd.edit) vipw: /etc/passwd is...

When I open it, It is readonly "/etc/passwd" [readonly] 31 lines, 1661 characters but I'm not sure why... I've checked our other servers are 100%... How can I fix it? I want to move very carefully since I don't want to break anything.

Hey Eoinkim, I've done that. But still happens though? root@c5:~# apt-get update Hit:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security buster/updates InRelease Hit:2 http://ftp.debian.org/debian buster InRelease Hit:3 http://download.proxmox.com/debian/pve buster InRelease Get:4...

Hey Guys, I've been struggling for a while to get my 1 server to update correctly. It just refuses... So being at a loss, I'm hoping the proxmox community will come to my rescue... When I run the update on our server. I am getting the below output... Does anyone have ANY advise that might help...

Thank you bud, The ceph osd auth del osd_num line did not work though. But it looks like everything else is 100% :). Thank you for the advise :)

Hey Guys, Ok so I'm hoping someone can please advise me.... So I removed 3 nodes from our cluster, initially following the node removal guide, but only afterwards noticing an issue... So in Ceph, I still see 2 servers, and 1 server with all it's OSD's. Since removing the 3 servers, the...

This does not answer the questions though... It only raises more... Maybe referencing it to an example may be better... If you don't mind. Let's say I have 3 servers, each with 10 SAS drives 6TB each drive... What would be the optimal way to increase the read/write speeds of the drives using...

This was helpfull thank you :)

Ok so I tested it and it seems as soon as the sender dependent default is enabled. All other mail routing is stopped...So I am sure I am missing something... Looking for more detailed docs still at the moment though to find a solution...

I did find this: https://www.howtoforge.com/community/threads/solved-postfix-sender-dependent-relay.73344/ Which makes sense, but brings into question how proxmox will deal with it. I can't imagine commenting out the transport maps is a good idea?...

I have no idea what I am looking for in the doc's... Haven't done something like this before... Can you maybe elaborate more or less what I should be looking for?