Search results

The side effect is that /dev/shm is missing now! :mad: Had to run the following commands inside the CT manually after creating it and disabling /sbin/start_udev: # mknod -m 600 /dev/initctl p # mkdir -m 1777 /dev/shm # mount /dev/shm

bump

Hi. After upgrading to the latest Proxmox VE 3.4 kernel (I believe it's the source), some of our OpenVZ containers suck out all available CT memory: top - 15:35:07 up 3 days, 13:34, 2 users, load average: 0.07, 0.05, 0.01 Tasks: 58 total, 1 running, 57 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie...

That helped, thank you! I will get back if the issue happens again

I've read the wiki several times. Can you please check what's wrong here:

Here is the diff between my packages and the list in the wiki: So, the only difference is the kernel version, but it appears that -46- is only available in the enterprise subscription. At least, apt-get update doesn't show it in the list. I've already installed -37- and gonna activate it on...

Hi tom, Thanks for the reply! I'm wondering why you're saying "very outdated system", since there're no pending updates for Proxmox itself, just some system files: Anyway, of course, I'll give it a try. I wouldn't like to upgrade to version 4.x at the moment, since it lacks support of...

Hi, Sometimes the VM stops right after the backup is started. VM is Windows 2003 Web Edition SP2 x86 - Windows's system.log just says about unexpected shutdown - Proxmox logs show nothing but vzdump error about not running VM What else can I check? Any help is appreciated.

Hi tom. I've faced this issue recently. Do you have any updates on the fix? Can you advise if the same issue exists with GlusterFS backend?

Thank you, Mr.Holmes. Could you teach me how you detected that this is graphic card emulation issue?

Hello, On my proxmox 3.2 box there're several openvz running containers and one running kvm. top shows 17% cpu activity of the kvm, while the kvm itself idling (1% cpu usage, screenshot attached). Does anyone know if it's a correct behavior and what to do if not? Thanks in advance! PS Some...

just to keep it in history. cleaning browser cache and cookies does help

deleting cookies helped! thanks!

I've faced the same issue. What was the solution? (tried to clean firefox cache - didn't help)

sumsum, changing scheduler to cfq did not affect ksoftirqd issue. Anyway, thanks for your help!

spirit, thank you very much! Kernel from pvtest repo has fixed the issue: top - 13:01:40 up 4 min, 1 user, load average: 0.26, 0.16, 0.07 Tasks: 135 total, 1 running, 134 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 0.1 us, 1.5 sy, 0.0 ni, 75.1 id, 23.3 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st KiB...

Some news. I've tried to run the test under another OS - CentOS 6. And there was no ksoftirqd eating CPU!! Although, the i/o wait is still around 20%, the absence of ksoftirqd in top says there's probably something in the Proxmox kernel. Any ideas what might it be?

Found two SATA controllers: Si3114 and MegaRAID SATA 150-4. Si3114 performs even worse than nVidia's. MegaRAID - performance is very bad as well: # dd if=/dev/zero of=./testf bs=1M oflag=direct ^C433+0 records in 433+0 records out 454033408 bytes (454 MB) copied, 35.3743 s, 12.8 MB/ I think I...

I don't use it as a raid controller. It's just a SATA controller. Software raid rules :) Anyway, trying to find another controller for tests.

Good point. I will try to find something and get back with a result. H8DMR-82 - is definitely a server grade hardware: http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/motherboard/Opteron2000/MCP55/H8DMR-82.cfm It might be just an old one.