Search results

Hello Guys Can Someone please help me understand this error on my log. Here is the log WARNING: ^* matches null string many times in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/^* <-- HERE [.](ma[dfgmqrstvw]|vb[esx]|ws[cfh]|xnk)$/ at /usr/share/perl5/PMG/RuleDB/MatchFilename.pm line 91. Here is the...

No, I do not see it very often , The vm is Digital Ocean VM , no google dns. My dns is : nameserver 67.207.67.3 I think that I will do a close follow up on this and update accordingly. Thanks for you help.

root@smg01:/var/log# grep dnsbl.sorbs.net /var/log/mail.log Oct 4 03:58:36 smg01 postfix/dnsblog[31674]: addr 95.181.155.38 listed by domain dnsbl.sorbs.net as 127.0.0.6 Oct 4 05:13:38 smg01 postfix/dnsblog[32188]: addr 162.243.61.162 listed by domain dnsbl.sorbs.net as 127.0.0.6 Oct 4...

Here it is ... root@smg01:/var/log# ping 122.0.206.66.dnsbl.sorbs.net PING 122.0.206.66.dnsbl.sorbs.net (127.0.0.6) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 127.0.0.6 (127.0.0.6): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.022 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.6 (127.0.0.6): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.040 ms 64 bytes from...

Here you go... root@smg01:/var/log# grep 66.206.0.122 /var/log/mail.log Oct 4 03:35:57 smg01 postfix/postscreen[31540]: CONNECT from [66.206.0.122]:41926 to [207.154.215.33]:25 Oct 4 03:35:57 smg01 postfix/dnsblog[31546]: addr 66.206.0.122 listed by domain...

Oct 4 00:06:16 smg01 postfix/dnsblog[30244]: addr 94.102.56.238 listed by domain 69e6d1a2cee5f01150efd8e0b17c4c3e.combined.mail.abusix.zone as 127.0.0.4 Oct 4 00:06:16 smg01 postfix/dnsblog[30244]: addr 94.102.56.238 listed by domain 69e6d1a2cee5f01150efd8e0b17c4c3e.combined.mail.abusix.zone...

I did set this on purpose because I like to be sure on the black list means ==> at list 2 blacklist for blocking.. this is not our problem , if you check the above IP against mxtoolbox you will sen that this IP is listed more than one.

Hi Guy's , I did set the But the systems sill miss up check , much less but still. Here is miss up check log : Oct 4 03:36:03 smg01 postfix/smtpd[31553]: connect from unknown[66.206.0.122] Oct 4 03:36:06 smg01 postfix/smtpd[31553]: NOQUEUE: client=unknown[66.206.0.122] Oct 4 03:36:06 smg01...

Hello Guys , I was wondering , why I can not test subject rule with hebrew/Arabic char but only English char. Why this field is not utf8 anable ? Can any one help Best regards , Koby Peleg Hen

Hello Guys , I would you to check this please , I was setting a rule name " Block Archive file Type" which ment to be blocking all king of archive (zip , rar etc..) By all mean not for blacking docx file type. Here is my mail.log : " Oct 1 16:45:20 smg01 postfix/smtpd[39356]: connect from...

Here it is... " dnsblog_reply_delay = 0s dnsblog_service_name = dnsblog postscreen_dnsbl_action = enforce postscreen_dnsbl_max_ttl = ${postscreen_dnsbl_ttl?{$postscreen_dnsbl_ttl}:{1}}h postscreen_dnsbl_min_ttl = 60s postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map = texthash:/etc/postfix/postscreen_dnsbl_reply_map...

From where I can get this list ?

From where I can get this list ?

Hi , This is an example of miss up log... The bold addr (31.169.70.165 ) should be block by the black list : SORBS SPAM + SORBS NEW , The systems seems to miss that check. As you can see , it is blocked by virus rule that come after. " Oct 1 09:40:38 smg01 postfix/smtpd[27822]: connect from...

I think it is a bug , Please check it yourself.

Hello guys , I did set the max_ttl to 3m... and it is still miss up checkes. And I do use multi rbl check let's say about 10 of them. I really do not understand why is this, It does looks like some delay or so or some white list error. I realy do not have much confidence with it , I do check it...

Hello Guys , I would like to ask please , why block rules with ==> application/vnd\.rar (rar) Is block *.docx.... One more question please : Where I can find why mail was blocking exactly , Because currently I was needed to eliminate one at the time to find out which one causing me trouble...

Thank you very much @hata_ph I thought I was dreaming....

Hello heutger , This is not my code... I took it from this forum. It would be nice to have it in the product. According to my problem , there is any help ?