Search results

Thank you very much for answers! One more thing closly related to this, I've been playing with "vm.swappiness" setting (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swappiness), which defaults to value 60, but I had bad experience with one host, where only single VM was virtualized - host with 64GB RAM, VM...

Ah, you are right, I've tested it now and was successful. So if I wan to start the VM there must be in total RAM + swap memory available of the VM's memory configuration to be able to start the VM? And please I need to clarify - min/max RAM values in the VM configuration - is that where...

Hello all, I'd like to get someone's view on using min/max memory values, ballooning device and KSM sharing, all those things related to memory management (KVM and Windows Server guests especially). I do understand how they works and what they do, at least i think so :eek:)... But my point is...

Hello, nothing critical, but just wanted to know why there is this limit preventing me to remove more than cca 30+ spams at once from quarantie. Always need to split the cleanup to multiple rounds... Error given: Parameter verification failed (400), id value may only be 600 characters long.

Does not seem to solve the custom blacklist problem... Because I want to black even "regular" mass mailing, that is not listed anywhere on external blacklist...

No, that is not true. Those blacklists are working, but are not able to see "real" sender addresses for some type of emails, typically mass mailing, because the sender is "masked" by envelope of the mass mailer. It is fun because you usually want to block mass mailing, huh? I hope proxmox will...

I think you cant solve this problem now, take a look at my different post here: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/block-action-not-working-as-expected.44309/#post-212043 No reply from proxmox yet...

Of course would be great to hear any comment to this situation. Thank you...

Well I think the problem is that mail processing and rules are checked only on server communication where the real address of sender may be hidden (especially for mass mailing) as the FROM field is envelope sender (machine) address and not real (human) address. This is of course the reason why...

I do have all mails counted as incoming (I see that on statistics), so I hope this is okay and this is not the case. I really can't see what is wrong with my configuration, see the screenshot to get quick overview.

And once again, I face the same problem with whitelist - email from domain listed in whitelist with accept action (priority 87) was quarantined by quarantine rule with lower priroity (priority 73). There must be something wrong or really unclear in mail processing through the rules.

Okay, I do understand it. But please can you confirm one fundamental thing - giving the rule priority 100 (making it one and only topmost), the rule will contain only one action (block) and only one who object (from) with list of emails and domains, should it block (reject) the mail if the...

Well I see another thread created recently here describing the same problem with black or white lists - emails are not triggering them when expected. You, tom, have answered there too. I have simple set of rules no where accepting anything from email addresses in header, just block address that...

Well can you explain it a litte more in detail? Does it mean, that analysing rules against full email header means that: there may be present another address in the header, that will cause to ACCEPT the mail based on different rule, - or - there is any other address in the header that might...

Hello all, I'm not able to block emails from unwanted sources, so I just want to clarify that I am doing everything right. I do have "Who object" with name "Newsletters" and I've filled it with emails and whole domains that I want to block. I've created Mail Filter action with name "Block...