Search results

Ok even consumer sata disks are better than ssds I think. No need for enterprises.

Our Pve servers has ssd sata for only pve os. But we think of using normal sata disk (7200rpm) . Do you think if would impact on overall pve performance? Vms are running on nvme disks. We think Sata disks will last longer because ssds may be failing in any time.

AFIK, metric does not provide cpu temps. After some search, I read k10temp module is a workaround. https://github.com/groeck/k10temp So is it possible to install that module ? Or anyway to get cpu temp with "sensors -j" ?

Even I deleted spf record yersterday. Still getting same refuse. Is not this weird? I now tried adding pmg as truested host. But why is it still checking spf not sure? Maybe dns cache issue..

Thank you very much. You helped a lot.

What do you mean by "add PMG as trusted relay to downstream server" ? What kind of trust you mean. I am mostly using exim.

Sorry, yes downstream server refuses. Btw, downstream server = my server begind pmg right? I think easiest way is second one "disable SPF checks on this downstream server (PMG can do SPF checking already)" Am I all right?

I use it for incoming mails only but having this stranger error: <user@domain-behind-pmg.com>: host domain-behind-pmg.com[1.2.3.4 > (User's server ip)] said: 550-SPF: 2.3.4.5> (PMG's ip) is not allowed to send mail from externalsender.com So basicly pmg is refusing mail from external sender...

I noted that this is also happening on some other domains behind pmg. Should I completely remove spf for domains behind pmg? What is proper spf for incoming mails? I use: v=spf1 a mx ip4:"PMG-IP" ip4:"MAIL-SERVER-IP" -all

Any other solution you think?

It is not an option to add PMG to that server. But I tried adding that domain to white list at top level, to bypass spf check. I hope it works..

When externalsender.com sends an email to a user behind PMG, he gets following spf error. And of course he is not allowed to send mail from PMG's ip. Why is this happening? <user@domain-behind-pmg.com>: host domain-behind-pmg.com[1.2.3.4 > (User's server ip)] said: 550-SPF: 2.3.4.5> (PMG's...

The ClamAV antivirus daemon clamav-daemon now uses socket-activation To disable the service you need to disable clamav-daemon.service and clamav-daemon.socket Do I have to do above after upgrade? It is for those who need to completely disable clamav right?

Thanks. Here is link: https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4791

Come on it is not be that impossible. If there is a user based list with right click implemented, global black list is also possible. Not thinking about rule system here.

Yes this feature as "Add to Global Backlist/WhiteList" in Spam Quarantine folder button, would be very useful.

What is your system?

This is crayz. Brandy new hardware and on 3rd day, I am getting this issue.

Just to make sure, this is not about ksm sharing ? So can we say, if windows does not leave much free ram, instead use for caching then it thinks it is better to do so to gaster things...

Should I disable or clean occasionally (if possible), that caching ? Because it makes me think there is no enough ram on vm. Is this something related to ksm or balooning setting? Or only with windows?