Search results

  1. dakralex

    Issue: Proxmox 8.2 Boot Failure After Firmware Update on Lenovo ThinkSystem SR650

    Welcome to the Proxmox forum! Have you already found a solution to your problem? If not, I suspect that in the process of the firmware upgrade, the boot entries were removed as a side-effect, which is the case for some hardware vendors. Which filesystem do you use? Is Proxmox VE booted with...
  2. dakralex

    Auto install USB issues

    Hi! Have you already found a solution to your problem? If not, at first glance it seems like it does not install Proxmox VE at all, but that there's an error displayed. It might be because you need to set a filter to select your NIC or disks, but to verify this, you can boot the automated...
  3. dakralex

    Command failed with status code 5 when trying to change cache mode to writeback

    Hi! Have you checked whether there is any error logged in the syslog/dmesg? What is the output of lvs -ao+devices?
  4. dakralex

    Remove BTRFS Mount

    Hi! Is this an external storage added manually? If so, then the disk needs to be manually unmounted with umount /dev/sda. But just from my gut feeling, /dev/sda is usually the first disk attached and therefore often the installation medium if there's no other storage interface used (e.g. NVMe)...
  5. dakralex

    Proxmox 8.3.5 and Connection Errors

    Hi! If it happens only on one server, then it'd be most likely the fault of the connection to the server. How is the network setup? What is the performance of the link between your host and the Proxmox VE server? Is there any packet loss?
  6. dakralex

    [SOLVED] API inconsistent

    Hi! Could you post the exact request (e.g. with curl) you're making and the permissions that the API token / user has? There's not much information about which permissions the role "Download" permits and it is important that the API token / user has the Sys.Audit permission for the ACL /nodes...
  7. dakralex

    LXC Ubuntu 24.04 the dmesg isn't working

    One way you could do this, even though I do not encourage it, is to add the syslog capability CAP_SYSLOG to the container. Another much less secure way is to set /proc/sys/kernel/dmesg_restrict on the host to 0, which allows any user on the host system, including any container, access to the syslog.
  8. dakralex

    initial set up proxmox/debian

    Hi! Could you elaborate a little bit more on your hardware and how you installed Proxmox VE? Is there any more output when booting/in grub? This is just an informational message from fsck about the root filesystem's state.
  9. dakralex

    Kernel Errors

    Hi! Are there any BIOS firmware upgrades available for your mainboard? Have you modified any BIOS settings on the machine?
  10. dakralex

    How to clean "zombie" fencing request in pacemaker after disaster recovery of a 8.3 cluster

    Hi! There's documentation for the PVE HA Manager in our admin guide at [0]. It's designed so that virtual machines and containers can be setup as highly available services, which will be automatically recovered to other nodes, e.g. in case of a failing node. [0]...
  11. dakralex

    LXC Containers won't start after reboot

    Is there a specific use case or reason why you need noatime on procfs? procfs in itself is a special file system, where there are no IO operations on reads anyway since the content of the files are either in-memory or generated on demand. Pretty much the same applies to sysfs as well.
  12. dakralex

    New install stuck at 99%

    Welcome to the Proxmox forum, Agasnine! Another simple suggestion, have you tried another flash drive to install from? Is there a RAID controller and do you know which it is?
  13. dakralex

    LXC Ubuntu 24.04 the dmesg isn't working

    Hi! I assume that this is an unprivileged LXC container, then this behavior is normal since unprivileged containers map the container's root user to an unprivileged user outside of the container. Therefore the root user in the container cannot perform any actions, which need the usual root...
  14. dakralex

    Kernel Patch für DawiControl aka Marvell 88SE9215 u.a.

    Interessant, sehe auch gerade, dass die zitierte Code-Zeile den Marvell 88SE9170 nur als Sub-Device registriert. Könntest du einen Output von lspci -nnk mitsenden?
  15. dakralex

    Kernel Patch für DawiControl aka Marvell 88SE9215 u.a.

    Hm, dieser RAID Controller sollte eigentlich bereits korrekt erkannt werden, da dieser seit Kernel Version 3.13 in der Gerätetreiber-Tabelle des AHCI Controller-Treibers eingetragen ist [0]. Der Patch betrifft nur den Marvell SATA Controller von dem im Blog-Artikel genannten DawiControl RAID...
  16. dakralex

    Understanding bind mount point permissions

    Welcome to the Proxmox forum, YamiGhor! First, these should probably be lxc.idmap and second these id mappings say, that the container's uid and gid 100000 should be mapped to the host's uid and gid 100000, which is probably not what you want. These high-numbered ids are usually reserved...
  17. dakralex

    LXC Containers won't start after reboot

    Hi @firsak! Could you share the configuration of your LXC container (i.e. pct config 102), the contents of /etc/fstab and the output of pct start 102 --debug?
  18. dakralex

    How to clean "zombie" fencing request in pacemaker after disaster recovery of a 8.3 cluster

    Hi! Proxmox VE doesn't use pacemaker, but has its own high availability solution called HA Manager. Is there a reason that you have set it up on the cluster?
  19. dakralex

    Kernel Patch für DawiControl aka Marvell 88SE9215 u.a.

    Hi! Der beschriebene Patch ist nun upstream für die Kernel Version 6.15 vorgesehen. Sobald dieser im Mainline-Kernel ist cherry-picke ich den Patch in den Proxmox VE Kernel, sodass das Gerät verwendet werden kann. Außerdem ist gerade ein Patch [0], der auf diesen aufbaut, vorgesehen und...
  20. dakralex

    Backup auf PBS schlägt mit Fehler "job failed with err -61 - No data available" fehl

    Das tut mir leid zu hören, jedoch muss der Fehler nicht zwingend fatal sein. Wenn SMART "PASSED" meldet, bedeutet dass das das NVMe insgesamt in einem guten Zustand ist. Das kann aber trotzdem bedeuten, dass es einen Bad Block [0] auf dem Speichermedium geben kann, was aber relativ normal ist...