Search results

I am not able to create an unprivileged TK File Server. When attempting top create it I receive the following error: extracting archive '/dpool/vmstorage/template/cache/debian-9-turnkey-fileserver_15.0-1_amd64.tar.gz' tar: ./var/spool/postfix/dev/urandom: Cannot mknod: Operation not...

Thanks for your response. Why can it be ignored? What does it mean? In my experience, ignoring an error in Linux eventually leads to other issues which eventually cause a catastrophic failure. I would like to understand the error, fix it, and possibly help others with the same problem. It...

Part2: lxc-start 101 20200626024150.684 DEBUG start - start.c:lxc_try_preserve_namespaces:166 - Preserved mnt namespace via fd 56 lxc-start 101 20200626024150.684 DEBUG start - start.c:lxc_try_preserve_namespaces:166 - Preserved pid namespace via fd 57 lxc-start 101 20200626024150.684...

For sure, please see below. I am testing with the TK File-Server as that is really what I am looking to use if possible. Thanks for your help Part1: lxc-start 101 20200626024149.728 INFO lsm - lsm/lsm.c:lsm_init:29 - LSM security driver AppArmor lxc-start 101 20200626024149.728 INFO...

Hi, I have been attempting to mount a ZFS dataset in a LXC container, but cannot get past the "error=-13 profile" error. I have been searching the internet and forums to find a concrete solution, but nothing seems to work. Adding "nesting=1", seems to resolve most of the apparmor errors...

Thanks, that makes sense for the most part. I was trying to configure a storage structure that is organized/logical, but does not deviate from what Proxmox is expecting. Is the new storage configuration defined below a better way to go? Using the structure below (and this is probably a dumb...

Hi, When creating a new VM, the VM images are located in a different location than what I have specified. I also see four copies of the disk image when creating a VM. How do I take /dev out of the picture, and use only /rpool/data/vmstorage/vm-images, and only have one copy of the image? Any...

This is really unfortunate. I was hoping to create a guide for my peers on how to configure Proxmox for use with a PA VM firewall. I have spent weeks trying to get this working and read hundreds of articles and forums, but I just can't afford to spend this kind of time just to get a VM spun...

Don't see anything for 4-g. But I cam able to see the driver health status for the Chelsio NIC in the BIOS, and both ports show up, and the device is "healthy"

All of the logs are form the Host at this point. Sorry, just trying to provide as much info as possible. I will check the 4-g, but I don't remember seeing that option.

can you also post the output of 'lspci -k' ? # lspci -k: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 4th Gen Core Processor DRAM Controller (rev 06) Subsystem: Lenovo 4th Gen Core Processor DRAM Controller Kernel driver in use: hsw_uncore 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Xeon...

Thanks for your response! It looks like Proxmox is not recognizing the second port of the NIC from what I can tell.

I am fairly new to Proxmox, so maybe there's an obvious solution I am just not seeing? I was reading other posts where people seemed to be experiencing a similar issue, I am just looking to see if anyone has any idea why this may not be working? Would buying a Community Subscription provide...

Is anyone able to provided some guidance on this? I would really like to get this working.

#find /sys/kernel/iommu_groups -type l | sort -t '/' -n -k 5 /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/0/devices/0000:00:00.0 /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/1/devices/0000:00:01.0 /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/1/devices/0000:01:00.0 /sys/kernel/iommu_groups/1/devices/0000:01:00.1...

Hi, I am working to implement a Proxmox host, solely dedicated to a Palo Alto VM series firewall. I am wanting to enable PCIe pass-through on the following NICs/interfaces: 1 x Chelsio T520 -BT (Dual port 10 Gb) 1 x Intel I350 (Quad port 1 Gb) 1 x Intel 82574L (Single port Gb)...

I appreciate all of the comments. I definitely see there are performance issues, and premature wear of consumer grade SSDs (which makes sense). The overhead is worth it considering what ZFS is doing under the covers. However, it's also the reason I was wanting some additional detail...