Search results

thought so. But I am not expecting any love from the devs as they seem to not support this scenario and rather have people use the backup server. Once back from holiday I'll give this one a try https://www.complete.org/zfs-rescue-disc/

I think your suggestion makes a lot of sense. If only we had a rescue disk that actually was able to rollback the snapshots created using the pve 7.1 iso zfs version. I'll echo again. Should anyone run into a fix for this then please let the world know.

I see, well in that case aren't we going about it coming from a wrong angle? when I run mount | grep pve-1 i get rpool/ROOT/pve-1 on / type zfs (rw,relatime,xattr,noacl) as far as I understood it means that rpool/ROOT/pve-1 is somehow linked to the top most directory ( / ), thus also including...

I am sad to learn it is still broken :( I decided to wait until pve 7.2 rescue/installer was out in the hopes things will be fixed by then but I see now it is already released so once I am back from holiday I will try that once. Or is that the one you used? as you did say 'latest ISO/USB' If...

appearantly things are still in limbo for root zfs rollback please see https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/rescue-mode-with-root-on-zfs-trouble.107172/ are you sure those directories are not also part of the rpool/ROOT/pve-1 directory? and as such snapshotted along with a root snapshot?

but even though the disks are of good grade. would not this mean just more wear and tear?

indeed, it's more every 5 seconds than 4

however, you did just set my mind at ease by a soooooo much

Thank you for your contribution. But all my systems are ZFS. I have left any other file system many many years ago. I will admit that I just lack the expertise to fully know what it is I am doing. For example I never knowingly configure a cache drive while installing PVE.

Please do not get me wrong, I might just as well be entirely paranoid. About a year and a half ago I had a hacking attempt by some of Russia's finest. I was just in time to ward it off, I think, I hope but I am just not experienced enough to know for sure. Now do not get me wrong. I love...

I think it is dragging a dead horse in the meantime. The people that got it working seem no longer interested to give a working configuration otherwise they would have done so already. I for one gave up on this a while back. That is not to say that I would gladly go back to this if someone...

@chamseddine installing openwrt no longer is an issue thanks to the help here earlier. So not really sure why you would post a link after the fact. Or have you solved the NTP, using PCEe devices from host issue? If so then please share that ;) Using NTP, host hardware, using a privileged...

I am also getting issues with NTP. When looking at the host syslog I do see the following udit[1065261]: AVC apparmor="DENIED" operation="mount" info="failed flags match" error=-13 profile="lxc-999_</var/lib/lxc>" name="/sys/fs/bpf/" pid=1065261 comm="mount" fstype="bpf" srcname="bpffs"...

I now have kernel version 5.13 rather than 5.4. it's even better than running an OpenWrt snapshot in a VM which will be having kernel 5.10

this guide worked like a charm. thanks a bunch everyone participating in this thread. let the good times begin!!!

I think that once OpenWrt has moved away from iptables the @ProxmoxStaff should give it a fair try. Maybe it works out great

And I've tried most all alternatives

?

I do think though that moving away from iptables can't happen soon enough

It's not only plenty. it is brutal ;)