Search results

I just spent hours playing with this... All to remove one annoying log entry.... The token thing is very confusing. The only way I was able to get it to work was have a user admin@pbs as well as an admin@pbs!client1 (token) But in the datastore permissions I had to add BOTH the user...

Any luck did you try longer? EDIT: I see your other thread you had to resort to mounting read only and cloning... Glad you got it to work https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/how-to-recover-failed-raid-access-storage.51105/#post-426671

Can you keep it running? may take longer - this sort of thing makes me re-evaluate zfs honestly. Slow Hard disks? or does it just get slower with even more TB... When this happened to me it made me re-evaluate zfs in production but it only took about 20-30 minutes for me 2TB. But even after...

Yeah, How big is your zpool size... I heard of some waiting even more?

This thread contiues to have a variety of results based on the newer kernel, meaning that there is / was an issue with the current kernel. However I am still not sold on proxmox 7.0... 6.4 is rock solid so I am going to continue to wait. I don't feel the entire professional/enterprise...

So does this io_uring have higher standards for more consistent memory etc? where as prior to this you could get by with lesser hardware? Do I just 'hope' my hardware will work if I use this new feature? Do I upgrade to 7...hope it wont crash if it crashes then disable io_uring? This is...

Ok I am glad you are trying though, it helps perhaps agree that it is more hardware related. I have a production 6.4 that is flawless and concerned about upgrading to 7.0. I don't see a rush at moment.

I've been following this thread.. won't be upgrading to v7. Is there some active proxmox testing going on this?

Could someone do a walkthrough on this, the guide for me looked a little confusing.

I have a container running pbs and a section of the slower hard disks for backups. But for an offsite I bought a refurb HP i5 for $300.. popped in 2 hard disks for zfs and now I have an offsite backup. You could do the same for a main pbs if you dont have enough resources for a container.

Why can't you add a 3rd box to run as a separate PBS?

The database is located here, if you copy this from the new install it may help? /var/lib/pve-cluster/config.db

/etc/resolv.conf

Check your DNS.. Can you ping www.google.com?

Double check your CPU settings in bios..

And what error?

No prob. Remember this just tests the network, once hard disks and VM's are involved it's separate but can help pinpoint the issue. Good luck.

So we're just verifying the network speeds from the hosts. You can test the other way as well. Next is to install iperf3 on the windows 2016 server try to iperf3 from it to the second pve. At least you can test network performance.

install iperf on both pve's "apt install iperf3" on one run "iperf3 -s" to be server on second run "iperf3 -c IP_OF_SERVER" then reverse test. see results. You can then go from the guest to hosts from windows for example... iperf3 is for windows too.

Could you install a second temporary drive.. install pve with same host name/network settings, then backup /etc/pve from it and restore it back on the main.