Search results

Thanks, Dominik. I tried it as v4 but that wasn't the cure, so I'll look into another form of sharing.

OK, let's try this a different way: Has anyone successfully mounted an NFS share that required a username/password?

I'm missing something really simple here. I've got a network share that's password protected. In /etc/pve/storage.cfg I changed the options line to state: options vers=3,username=myusername,password=mypassword (not my real username/password, of course.) When the backup task tries to...

From the page on Ceph:

How about here?

As a related point, not directly related to your question, I saw this the other day: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/filecab/2016/11/18/dont-do-it-consumer-ssd/ I thought it was a solid breakdown on performance issues between enterprise- and consumer-grade SSDs, and why you want the former...

This is actually the link I was looking for. No wonder I couldn't find it here.

There have been a couple of other threads about this, but I only saw one in a quick perusal of the forum. As I understand it, if you're using the enterprise repository you aren't affected.

So, here's what he needs to know: RAID1 is a mirror. One drive fails and things keep on chugging. Two drives fail and you're screwed. RAID10 is a way to string lots of RAID1 mirrors together. You can get better speed this way, and recovering from one failed drive is faster than with the...

If you dig around there are some recommendations, but I'd look at Samsung SM863 drives for an affordable cache disk. Size isn't all that important: basically ZFS is going to queue up disk writes and synch them all to disk every 5 seconds or so, and synchronous writes that happen between those 5...

I don't have any idea, but I'd assume so. I'm just monitoring to see how Proxmox wants us to react to this.

This comment was made from one of the developers this morning on Hacker News:

As a data point: on a Dell T30 pve I've got a mostly idle kvm web server that I just installed sysbench on. It gave me the following: Nothing fancy on that server at all, also running Centos 7.

I believe you can do this with a VLAN if your networking equipment also supports VLANs. Someone else should talk you through it though; I understand it but have never worked with it. You don't need to have segregated networks, but it really is a good idea...

Yep. Odds are you're measuring different things.

It's actually pretty simple. Think of it this way: You've got a proxmox machine. You can have a cluster, but conceptually it's the same. On this machine you have two network ports. One port is for communication with proxmox. This is a "safe" network, protected from the outside. The other...

What he said. Create a management network for the Proxmox hosts to live on, that you use to access them. Then create a virtual bridge that is used by your VMs that isn't addressable in Proxmox, so the VMs have access to their own network (maybe one that's not routable to the management...

I was trying to help you isolate the problem. I had Proxmox problems because the machines in the cluster weren't using the same time, and ntp wasn't working its magic because when I'd configured the firewall I configured ntp using TCP ports. This didn't work because ntp uses udp so time sync...

Just to be clear: same physical servers, same network rules, same IP addresses, install Proxmox = no time sync, install SUSE/Ubuntu and time sync works? I'm just trying to rule out network issues - in my case time problems were caused by a misconfigured firewall.

In English it's "measure twice, cut once." Something a carpenter would say. Nice that it translates so well. :)