Search results

Hm ... I monitor this thread since some years (!!) now and the intel platform has this issue since ages and it is in the Linux Kernel or in the Intel network drivers in the kernel!! And it is there for ages. Yes it sometimes hit and sometimes not for ages, so I assume noone really knows how...

... tried with this several hours ... no chance in my case

For me this UI had exactly the same issues like the graphical one ...

The good thing is ... that also after upgrade to 8.x then the "shell" is shown on my TV ... so I think the issue really relies in the installer part which should not have any impact on the real usage afterwards

I also struggeled with this the last two days ... I tried anything I could find including nomodeset or other stuff. In the end I used the latest 7.4 iso installer and this one works flawlessly!! After that first was updating all packages and upgrading to 8 ... But yes something has really...

Thank @aaron you for all the details! For PVE: The reality is a 3+3+1 setup, so Quorum wise for PVE it works all as expected (I just simplified it for above Cepth question) - and yes I already have HA here on this basis (just with glusterfs). And yes the goal is to allow one "room" (aka also...

Hi All, I have a 6 node proxmox setup with Intel Nucs in my house as HA cluster. Currently I use Glusterfs to provide a shared FS, but I think about changing to Ceph. The Nucs are spread over 3 places in the house with own USVs and in sum provide a big "distributed replicated storage" - that...

Onwe question because I'm about to also migrate: Is such a "network interface renaming" also likely fpor intel Nuc machines? Right now the interface is called "eno1"

I have run the pve6to7 script and have for all my VMs and LXCs such warnings: INFO: Checking storage content type configuration.. WARN: VM 104 - volume 'glusterfs-container:104/vm-104-disk-0.qcow2' (unreferenced) - storage does not have content type 'images' configured. WARN: CT 312 - volume...

Hey, I exchanged the NUC5PPYH in the meantime, but had one working some weeks ago without any issues.

Ok, I correct myself ... seems to be in the latest version ... I get at least the UI fields :-)

Would also be my question @t.lamprecht ... I did not saw on any bigger changelog so far (or me blind :-)) )

As an additional information. Starting with glusterfs 8 they introduced a new service that also handles mounts and destroys that again ... so the glusterfssharedstorage.service need to be deactivated and stopped

Awesome, thank you!

Ok, then I looked before you did update AUR packages :-) My issue so far was not the backup-client repo - yes there version tags are used. But I also needed to checkout the "proxmox" repo and here I did not saw version tags ... But lest phrase it that way: I have no real clue what I do there...

> FYI: There's an Arch Linux User Repository (AUR) client package already, it's relatively simple to maintain as the compilation is done on the user side. Hm ... Yes they stopped at realease 0.8.x ... I currently do that manually for each of your release ... it is not that easy s yu think...

Any update here? It is not that fun of my life to compile each version manually and always adjust to the latest changes and in fact I can only hope that it works because some repos do not use git tags so I can only get "Master very fast after a release" to hope I have something working ...

Any news here? It is not that fun as it sounds to build every version manually

So you will fix that in a coming update?

hey, I'm using PBS on PVE since some time and everything was ok. Yesterday I updated to the latest 0.9.4-1 and got a backup error. Basically it seems that since the last version PVE tries to call "prune" at the end of the backups. INFO: running 'proxmox-backup-client prune' for 'ct/306' ERROR...