Search results

running a very simple set-up with Proxmox on ZFS I'm looking to have snapshot of everything in /etc and other select directories. Essentially / without rpool and subsequent volumes. Since df -h shows mountpoint to be /root/RPOOL/pve-1 / i tried: zfs snapshot -r rpool/ROOT/pve-1@may2024...

I don't understand what you're asking # pveupdate # pveupgrade

After a mere pveupdate+pveupgrade the standalone Proxmox VE is now broken (again) Things that broke are : a kernel module .conf file (fix= `rm /etc/modprobe.d/e1000e.conf`) the GPU udev rules suddenly contained GROUP== instead of GROUP= (fix: remove = from ==) not 100% sure but the monitor...

thanks, did work for some time but the issue is back and resurfaces after multiple repeats of this sequence

unless you did something not documented here and something I've not tried yet, the issue will resurface my system is a single-node Proxmox set-up, which I think is part of the issue resurfacing

no solutions presented in this thread work and keep working this seems to be an issue which is not addressed as it only seems to happen on non-cluster proxmox ?

@mfgamma not sure what you mean with that. In terms of attack surface OPNsense inside or outside of Proxmox is not so much different. To make the picture more complete. Know it is possible yet of low likelihood a vulnerability will exist in both Linux and BSD. Of the top of my head I only...

i wasted a lot of time on pci-passthrough with AMD GPU eventually I ... started using a reset script for the PCI which is required with some GPU This is more or less what is required, in case you want to attempt 2 GPU in your machine erased all configuration added to the boot loader (mostly...

Depends entirely in how far you'd trust pfsense/opnsense. This week I finally had time to dive into the OPNSense Suricate service crashing issue. This issue is poorly documented or I missed out on where it is documented. Now I do have a bit more trust in OPNSense. Obviously chances an freemium...

there are actually limitations to virtio queue size (max = 1024), you can actually find that with a few minutes on a search engine https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-23.03/nics/virtio.html

you seem to conflate network interfaces which are virtual and network interfaces which are virtual -device 'virtio-net-pci,mac=XXX,netdev=net0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x12,id=net0,vectors=10,mq=on,packed=on,rx_queue_size=1024,tx_queue_size=256' setting this manually in 105.conf is probably mandatory

silly checklist * does the Protectli VP4650 have virtualisation enabled and/or hyperthreading ? * is the Qemu-guest-agent installed in opnsense ? * are you bonding network interfaces ? * how many cores did you assign to the opnsense vm ? * how much memory did you assign to the opnsense vm ?

wild guess, this depends on the VM network interface not being the physical network interface for proxmox ?

I had a similar challenge. In the end you need to mark the bridge as VLAN-aware, that's about it. Mind you, it can make sense to create vlan-enabled bridges, and I eventually did.

This how-to-fix post to inform people on how Suricata crashes with OPNSense on Proxmox (any version) can be remediated. The advisories here may not be suitable for production environments, I trust you know this already. Context VM-hardware has Q35 chipset and uses virtio network interfaces...

No, in my case it was not. It really is udhcp deployed by proxmox on the server.

@archerne same issue here, this is beyond weird to me at this time

After hours of messing with this situation it , most likely and probably, comes down to some awkward stuff going on This situation defies explanation as "the problem" seems to not only happen by itself but also by some unknown parameters. The end result is the Proxmox Web Interface loading then...

so if i change the non-loopback-ip address to a different non-loopback address and reboot the system all will work well ?

Thanks. That error escaped me. I was only confronted with a seemingly wiped folder. is there a documented procuedure on how to change the non-loopback iP ?