Ok Mir, i will do it, anyway, many thanks, i value much the help you have given me.
If you want to know the results of my question in the drbd forum, only let me know.
Best regards
Cesar
Hi Mir
Excuse me please if I am bothering you again, but i have now a little problem with drbd-utils 8.9.1 version and LVM, maybe you can help me again, if you can't help me, i will understand it. Anyway, many thanks for all your valuable help.
This is the web link where i write the problem...
Hi to all
@To Mir or anyone that can help me
- I have a problem with "drbd-utils 8.9.1" version, it was downloaded from
the git and compiled in my Debian Wheezy, the error messages are these:
root@pve1:/# pvcreate /dev/drbd21
File descriptor 3 (/usr/share/bash-completion/completions)...
Hi again
I answer me to myself (I hope someone can help):
Any version of DRBD not must be used (and maybe nor compiled) while the system have installed openvswitch.
In a compilation of DRBD, while openvswitch was installed and configured, i had this error message:
WARNING...
Hi to all
Anybody know if DRBD 8.4.4 or 8.4.5 (or any version) have some problems with NICs Intel X520-DA2 or with Intel X520-DA2 + transceivers?
- The servers are Dell R720, the RAID controller is a PERC 8710P (chip LSI with 1 Gb cache + BBU)
- Several hard disks in several arrays configured...
Re-Edited:
Hi to all
Now i have the same problem with drbd 8.4.4, that in other servers always it worked very well, i have to investigate which is the problem.
Maybe the new Hardware ¿? ¿? ¿?
Hi Mir
Thanks for your reply.
With the configuration "minor-count 255;", DRBD accept my configuration, but always i get such error messages.
And from now (with the "minor-count" directive), always that I restarted the DRBD service, i see the resources lifted and synchronized.
version: 8.4.5...
Hi Mir
Many thanks for your .deb installers, it install very well.
Now i have another problem:
After configuring DRBD, when I start the DRBD service, I receive these messages in both nodes:
<1>received netlink packet for minor 14, while expecting 11
<1>received netlink packet for minor 14...
Hi e100, is a pleasure to greet you again (you are the great master of masters)
Many thanks for the clarification, and maybe i am wrong, but as i understand, if we have a shared key in DRBD, any transmission will be encrypted. If it no bothers, do you have a web link that speaks about of this...
Hi macday
This are my suggestions:
1) Read all in this link - DRBD tuning recomendations (including the next web pages of the same topic of tuning recomendations, these recommendations should be your bible):
http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-throughput-tuning.html
At first glance, I would...
Hi to all
Long time ago i was talking with Lars, and he tell me that "data-integrit-alg" only should use for purposes of test and never in a production enviroment due that typically exist modifications of the network packets (upper layers in my case refers to the Hardware into the same PC due...
Hi shrek
This is the message:
ixgbe 0000:46:00.0: PCI INT B -> GSI 85 (level, low) -> IRQ 85
ixgbe 0000:46:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
ixgbe: 0000:46:00.0: ixgbe_check_options: FCoE Offload feature enabled
ixgbe: allow_unsupported_sfp Enabled
ixgbe 0000:46:00.0: failed to load because an...
Hi
I again with with other problem
I have a Intel qsfp+ card according to these links:
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/network-adapters/converged-network-adapters/ethernet-x520-qda1-brief.html
http://ark.intel.com/es/products/68672/Intel-Ethernet-Converged-Network-Adapter-X520-QDA1
The...
Hi to all
Anybody that can help me.
I see that PVE have a problem with the communication with the NFS storage when the PVE host have other IP address in other NIC for the NFS communication.
All my PVE servers have nfs-kernel-server installed and configured in a second physical and separate...
DABAAADABBAADOOOooo, Many thanks Mir!!!! , i believe that tomorrow i will do the test.
Can you explain how do it?. This question is due to that in the future, i always will have the same problem with the new versions of DRBD-utils.
I will be extremely grateful.
Best regards
Cesar
Hi mir
Sorry, I was wrong, the problem of not respecting directories persists (installed in a new PVE host).
What I can do for that drbd-utils-8.9.1 respect the directories structure of Debian?
Best regards
Cesar
Hi mir, i hope you are well.
If you can help me with two questions about of DRBD 8.4.5 in PVE, please see this link:
http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/20352-PVE-and-DRBD-8-4-5
If not, anyway, many thanks
Cesar
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.