Search results

Hi e100 Some comments: a) To continuation i write a copy of a answer from Dietmar for me: "Each created resource has the size you specify for the virtual disk - that is how it already works." b) I don't have practice with PVE 4.x, nor with DRBD 9.x c) Soon i will need install some PVE nodes...

Hi nicorac. Maybe the problem of kernel panic is due to that "LVM thin provisioning" isn't stable (if is that you are using it), but i am not sure about of this. Have you tested "LVM2" instead of "LVM thin provisioning"? "LVM2" has many years and is very mature (in contrast to "LVM thin...

Recently i have read that with drbdmanage will be possible to do grow a DRBD resource when the developers finish the code, and only in a role secondary, although at the moment the option is enabled but not working (read in a forum with date of dec/2015), then, i don't know if now really works...

With my practices in DRBD 8.x, it is possible when all LVs (logical volumes) are unmounted, always that LVM be in top of DRBD. But, i believe using the PVE GUI for create a DRBD resource, "DRBD will be in top of LVM", that if it is correct ( according to the DRBD9 Proxmox Wiki introduction...

Oh, Ok, thanks, i believe that this will be good for my strategy. Then, will be the DRBD resource the same size that the volume that will be used for the virtual disk?, if correct, when i resize the virtual disk by the PVE GUI, also will be changed the size of the DRBD resource, right? (and all...

Oh, ok, sorry, It was just a question for my knowledge. Anyway, thank you very much for your kind attention.

e100, first of all, it is a pleasure to greet you, after all this time. Oh, then if i want extend a virtual disk by the PVE GUI, PVE in first step extend the DRBD resource, and after, the resize the virtual disk? ... if i am not wrong, i understand that if a DRBD resourse is created by the PVE...

MMmmm.... is excelent !!!, thanks nicorac.... :-) For a future caution using DRBD 9.1 or higher versions, let me to do a questions: Knowing that DRBD 9.x isn't stable today, do you know if with "PVE 4.x" and "DRBD 9.x" is possible to do a configuration at style "DRBD 8.x" in several PVE...

Many thanks nicorac. And let me to do a question: Do you have the kernel pve-kernel-4.2.8-1-pve_4.2.8-41 installed? Best regards

Hi I am interesting in know if the compilation of DRBD 8.4.7-1 is stable with the lastest kernel version of PVE.

Many thanks Spirit ... :-)

Hi Spirit Please, let me to do a questions: - From what version of PVE can I configure the agent? - In Linux VM, can I configure the agent?, and how? Best regards

Many thanks for the info. I think that this info must be in the notifications thread. Best regards Cesar

Thanks for the answers... :-) Only as a comment... In VMware, for do snapshots, first download the write cache to disk. In VMware, for do backup snapshots, Veeam Backup first download the write cache to disk using the agent in Vmware tools and after does the backup. In conclusion, the VMs can...

I know that ZFS is a vampire consuming RAM, but if your kernel support the fake RAID, the advantage that you will gain is that will have much free RAM. Moreover, ZFS is fantastic and super sure of using (because he does several verifications and repairs in hot).

Oh, that's good :-) .... that it is as Veeam Backup works. Please, let me to do some questions about it: 1) Is the agent as a stable version for use in production environment? 2) In what Windows systems versions works the agent? (i guess that since win-2k) 3) If the agent is not installed, i...

But you should know that use "writeback" is dangerous if you have critical information, because the write cache is in the RAM, and this setup not write the data in the HDDs immediately (or in the RAID controller), so if you does a hard reset, or something similar, is sure that you will get a...

With PVE 3.x, i know that fake RAID (also know it as host o soft RAID) isn't supported in the majority of the cases, but with PVE 4.x, that has a kernel that is based in the kernel of Ubuntu server, I am not be sure, maybe some one can dispel this doubt, that i will be very grateful. Best...

- A guide of the new corosync version here (with the option "two_node" and much more things): http://people.redhat.com/ccaulfie/docs/Votequorum_Intro.pdf - The example of notfixingit is from here (of Pacemaker 1.1)...

If you can put the Switches in "stack" mode, you will have high availability in the Switches, and the PVE nodes with two NICs, each one connected to each Switch in LACP mode. LACP also is known as "link aggregation" or "port channel". If the setup above is for the Switches of servers, with this...