Search results

One more update: All our out again. Scientficspam has significant false-positives, Beetjevreemd has a 3:1 ratio of false-positives:hits, so it's out as well. EDIT: for me, I only test for myself, so please do your own tests!

My plan is to update my thread soon and also move the content to Github (to keep it easier to maintain for me and the users). I also plan to write some more about my security optimization trials with SPF, DKIM, DMARC, TLS 1.3, DANE etc. Currently I'm very spare of time, especially now at Corona...

I believe, the answer shouldn't read such way. However, in the beginning of PMG getting Open Source, there were really stupid questions in the forum, wrong postings or questions in other language without any glue, which language it is and why they don't use e.g. Google Translator (or I prefer...

I don't know, why this escalated as such much. And I also don't understand, why this topic arises again, although it has already been cooled down. From my point of view, the question was, if someone can contribute tutorials in Spanish. However, I also don't understand, why anyone from the...

No, as written, this post is only to document, which blacklists I tested. It’s for others as well but mostly for me to be able to check, if I already tested a blacklist or not as there are so many. The final set is somehow on my Advancing PMG Thread, somehow because the last two lists are xxxed...

Update: I got contact with the operator of dnsbl.beetjevreemd.nl and it seems only to be accessible via IPv6. black.dnsbl.brukalai.lt and light.dnsbl.brukalai.lt are both producing too much false positives, they are both out. New one to test is bl.scientificspam.net and rhsbl.scientificspam.net.

As written, provide a use case, open a feature request bug in the bug tracker and maybe it will be added in future. However, PMG isn't meant (currently, I would also prefer something different to improve the product, e.g. adding archive functionality, adding mail server functionality, adding...

DKIM is broken by design, SPF as well. SRS is not always implemented, ARC (to fix problems with DMARC) is much less implemented. I can send mails to Google Mail Abuse address about all the well SPF approved and DKIM signed DMARC valid spam I get from them without using SPF and DKIM or DMARC on...

For outgoing mails you don’t need to do anything extra, DMARC is a DNS thing, so Proxmox can’t add to the GUI (beside maybe an explanation what to do, but that’s somehow overkill). For inside checking DMARC is somehow implemented in SpamAsssassin by checking for SPF and DKIM. If you also want...

That's it, that's what I meant with wrapper. So you may use your own external script or (better and more welcome) contribute your external script code to consider to include with official packages and being able to use ESET out of the box. However, keep in mind as mentioned before, that I...

DKIM is signing messages, SPF is providing a list of "allowed" mail servers to send mails on your domains behalf. DMARC helps you to enforce your settings by getting informed on any misuse and providing guidance on how to handle mails with invalid/missing DKIM signature and violating your SPF...

Why rspamd? rspamd is somehow the same as PMG (just - for me - not such as good as a customized PMG). Postfix is fine, Dovecot is fine as well. If you're using webmail, maybe you should consider to use sieve for learning ham and spam on user actions by moving mails to spam folder or vice versa...

Subscribe to the developers mailing list and contribute your code there. I believe, they will be able to help out. Also try not to manipulate but add a wrapper, which should be the latest update, so any antivirus software can be called. Then this change will also be update safe.

I currently try dnsbl.beetjevreemd.nl, which looks fine, if it works. On one system it works well, on the other, I'm unable to get use of, I always get SERVFAIL also on the test address 127.0.0.2 (or for sure to be used in reverse order). I also try black.dnsbl.brukalai.lt and...

I remember, I had both on my list too, but F-Secure I mean to remember was also expensive and Eset was one of the solutions, which looked fine, but not official supported any more, you just can find "old" deep links. Dr.Web only looked to be affordable, demonized and still supported, however, I...

Be careful with SPF, if like to use and set it, you are required not forget about it. Otherwise, your mails may be rejected.

I'm not sure, but I believe, on our roadmap there is development of a WHCMS plugin for our business on ssl certificates. If you ask someone to code a PMG WHMCS plugin for you, I then may be able to refer you to a developer based on our experience. For sure, a PMG WHMCS plugin is not available...

Seems to be just the same suggestion as others and would also well integrate, as that would help out for some issues as well would provide better anti spam quality by allowing better learning of ham and spam via e.g. GUI actions on the "archive backend" (moving to spam or ham on user action).

Check the documentation you can integrate any antivirus solution via modifications via shell. However, where are just a few ones, which really makes sense. ClamAV is free, but worse detection. Avast is fine on detection and affordable. Dr.Web may be the only solution, which is demonized, still...

Best would be to create a feature request in bug tracker and post the link here, I would then vote on that too.