Search results

Thanks, however it showed 5.15.74-1 before reboot as well as after reboot?

I'm a bit confused. I use the unattended-updates, which should remove old kernels, but it doesn't. I tried pvekclean and it removed two kernels without reboot. I did a uname -a and it showed me the .15 kernel, after your message I rebooted and it still showed me the .15 kernel? .15 in full...

There was a recent kernel update from PMG. I try to keep the system clean and use pvekclean to remove old kernels. I expected, I need to reboot first and then be able to remove the old kernel, but it seems to have been used already. So my question is: Is there no reboot required? Are new kernels...

Thanks for your response. I recently authored the thread Advancing Proxmox Mail Gateway. It took many time to get there and I also monitored the forum and responded to many posts. However, my private situation changed since then and I step down from maintaining. In my company (which I'm out of...

I currently try a new approach of optimizing PMG but keep update-safe. That result in less adjustments, asking for the most important adjustments to be implemented to the core product (as feature requests in bugzilla) and negotiate the final result of additional adjustments. So therefore I have...

So also for the PMG components updates should be done manual or I need to use something like unattended upgrades?

You need to do for /var/log/syslog similar to messages below. You can use rotate value to increase and/or weekly attribute to different attribute like monthly, yearly, ... However, it depend on your storage capability on one hand and your memory as well as your cpu performance for the tracking...

Does PMG provide autoupdate or is it required to manually install updates?

Thanks. I currently need to prioritize my team and wasn't still yet able to provide a new guide. I will provide any time soon, provide a repository therefore and easier access to discussion via Github. I already set up the project there, but wasn't able to do the job yet. I won't believe...

Currently this feature request has been rejected. Maybe you can ask again or vote on Bugtracker.

Hi, I'm currently very rare of time. So just quick: I considered eset (seems to be not official supported any more) and considered sophos (the only useful option requires api integration which is not provided by pmg), so I finally ended up with avast, which is already supported by pmg and...

Question is to @Miktash

May you be able to contribute your code to be embedded in the official distribution?

autolearn may still stay at no, although you trained bayes, because the level to be reached for autolearning keeps the same, either you learned the bayes database manual or not. For sure, that makes sense not to learn any messages, which are just possible spam, but also doesn't make sense on...

Hi, yes *2 means a score factor of two. In combination with the dnsbl threshold setting it can easier reach the necessary amount of points (at my setup 2) or in other words, a factor 2 list directly blocks the mail meanwhile a factor 1 list requires additional one to block. However, in later...

Thanks for response. Training is always somehow required but is also the only way beside blacklists and some settings to improve the filter over time.

And once again nothing new. All the lists above (still) produce too much false-positives to be useful.

rspamd is most based on fuzzy technique, which is much more mystery than AWL and Bayes together. ;-) That one didn't work for me at all. FCrDNS is also not working for me and is the same thing like @ittk posted above. You can be the preacher, which try to shame all the ones, which don't...

My five cents on that: I have AWL and Bayes enabled. Both works fine for me, however, Bayes isn't working for either installation with autolearn. My private installation for sure has much too less mails to ever reach the required volume of spams (ham is no problem). My commercial test...

Scrollout F1 is doing something similar like this. Would be great to have such thing similar in PMG, however, I would prefer not to add to blacklists, but to either learn as spam and/or (optionized) to have a "local blacklist" running, which takes such IP addresses and add them to a local...