Search results

Yeah. If you're going to rant about some site not being secure you ought to at least say what site you're talking about. And yelling about group X on unrelated group Y's forum is just...chef's kiss.

Window size can change and serial terminals don't have a standard way to communicate that. SSH does which is why you don't see the problem there.

In general they work fine for ext4 or lvm setups. Do remember though that they will be written to by N machines rather than just one. So the expected lifetime will be less than it would be with the same number of physical machines.

Why would you think there is no limit? Of course there is. Things like "how many bits in a block index" will limit the size. Making things "infinite" is not possible without killing performance or wasting a lot of space. Anyhow, ext4 has a max file size of 16 TiB with the default 4k block...

I think it is pretty clear that the OP wants to use a different mirror for getting templates. Presumably the local mirror has different or modified ones compared with the PVE default.I don't know the answer to that question through.

Your NFS mount isn't really mounted and you are writing to the directory where you think it should be mounted.

Likely adding more swap will just let it use more. The best way to reduce the red bar would be to get more RAM or reduce the size of your VM's. You can fiddle with settings like swappiness but IMO it is just moving the deck chairs around. I see you use ZFS. I don't but another thing to check...

Is performance actually affected or are you just concerned by the red color? Since your RAM is 80% full the system likely decided that some things weren't worth keeping in RAM. The way to tell if they are little-used is by how much it affects the system performance. If things are running along...

First off, warnings in red don't work. People ignore them, especially when things have gone wrong. See all the threads about people wrecking their system after getting a warning about what they were about to do. Secondly, if a process is in an uninterruptible wait inside the kernel (state D in...

Well, it would be ZFS-on-ZFS would it not? Does that answer your question?

It isn't formatted as ZFS, no. That depends on what the VM does with it.

To be honest if this is just a learning exercise things would be a lot simpler if you put two instances of PVE on the same laptop. Then they can talk to each other and to the host without doing anything special.

Oh, wait a minute. I must have misunderstood your initial post. There are two laptops involved. I was thinking it was just one with two instances of PVE. Yeah, that won't work. Wifi does not work with bridging. Access points normally reject frames that don't come from the MAC that initially...

Enabling it would be one possible workaround.

I don't know enough about virt-manager to offer any suggestions. Sorry. Maybe somebody else?

This is why we all love Nvidia so much. Does the Nouveau driver not work?

I believe that virt-manager by default sets up a NAT network. So you'd need to not just "open" ports but set up port forwarding. Otherwise each PVE is basically behind a NAT firewall and can't receive connections from outside.

Most likely it got changed before the upgrade but the VM was never restarted so the change didn't get applied.

Did the display for that VM get changed to Spice?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯