Hey,
what you are describing sounds good. You'd have, as you said, one of the NICs passed through to the OPNsense VM, and configure it as WAN there. The other NIC (to your switch) is then on vmbr0, where also your PVE host has an IP. Then in OPNsense you'd configure the interface on vmbr0 to be...
Hey,
you can pass through one of the NICs to the pfSense VM and configure it to be WAN. Then create a second Linux Bridge in PVE and attach it to all VMs including the pfSense one, then configure it to be the LAN side in pfSense and setup a DHCP server on the vmbr interface(if you want DHCP in...
Hey,
what does systemctl status pveproxy say? I assume you can SSH into it since you can ping it, could you post the output of ip a? Can you ping your router from PVE? And does ss -tulpn | grep 8006 output something?
Hey,
can you ping the PVE host(from 192.168.7.0/24)? I assume the whole 192.168.0.0/24 network is routed through the tunnel, does communication between those two networks generally work? What handles the routing between those two network, your router, or is that done on the PVE host?
Hey,
deletion happens over /config/ruledb/who/{ogroup}/objects/{id} [1]. You need the id of the object.
[1] https://pmg.proxmox.com/pmg-docs/api-viewer/index.html#/config/whitelist/objects/{id}
edit: misread blacklist for whitelist
[1]...
Hey,
kannst du mal prüfen ob die Interfaces in ip a mit denen in /etc/network/interfaces zusammenpassen? Falls nicht wäre /etc/network/interfaces anzupassen. Bei updates kann es vorkommen, dass sich Interfacenamen ändern, das sollte zwar nicht passieren, kann aber vorkommen.
Hey,
can you ping the PVE instance? Could you post the output of ip a and systemctl status pveproxy.service? The messages in the logs just mean your system probably made a time jump, the problem will correct itself since it's not too big of at difference. These messages are mostly cosmetic.
Hey,
you can just add a .100 and .200 to the interface name in your /etc/network/interfaces. For reference you can take a look at [1], there are also some examples.
[1] https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/vlan/vlan-interfaces.5.en.html
Hey,
sounds like something that could make sense, there is already an open feature request for that on [1]. You can add yourself to the CC list, so you'll get notified if something changes.
[1] https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2672
Hey,
take a look at the Tracking Center[1], there you'll find information about all mails that were processed and why, or why not, they were accepted.
[1] https://pmg.proxmox.com/pmg-docs/pmg-admin-guide.html#pmg_tracking_center
root@pxb02:/mnt/datastore/pbs-local/ns/Kat0# ls -la
...
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4 Mar 26 14:52 vm
das sollte nicht so sein, hast du da manuell mal was angelegt?
Mit
chown -R backup:backup /mnt/datastore/pbs-local/ns/Kat0/vm
kannst du den "Owner" der Dateien/Verzeichnisse ändern, dann...
Ich meinte nicht so einen user, es geht darum wem die Dateien im Datastore Verzeichnis gehören uns als welcher user der backup Prozess auf diese zugreift. Kannst du ls -la unter /mnt/datastore/pbs-local und /mnt/datastore/pbs-local/ns/Kat0/vm ausführen und die Ausgabe die posten.
Hey,
Backups gehören dem user backup, dieser sollte also berechtigt sein unter /mnt/datastore/pbs-local zu schreiben. Mit ls -la kannst du die Berechtigungen einfach überprüfen. Ist was unter /mnt/datastore/pbs-local gemounted, oder ist das lokaler Speicher?
Hey,
could you post the VM config(qm config <VMID>) and the output of ip a from inside the VM. How did the VM get its IP, is it statically assigned or do you have a DHCP handing out IPs?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.